Choosing a multicooker

[vernisag]

vernisag, understandably.

I'm talking about three liters, yes, for 1300 I bought Martha, for 1450 Polaris and for 710 rubles a bowl from Panasonic. I bought Panasonic in the Matrix for 2 thousand, when there was a rush just about them on the forum. I lacked exactly the possibility of Yoghurt, multi-cook, active frying.
I now have a tandem of two three-liter bottles and Orsson 5015 very successfully. Panasonic is not bad. But morally outdated by 4 years in terms of possibilities

Panasonic is not bad. But morally outdated by 4 years in terms of possibilities

Here I am about that, I always miss active frying

Thanks to everyone who unsubscribed! But I got even more confused .. Why is the old model of Panasonic, like a mammoth, when there is a more modern one? Can you explain please

[Pampushka]

Pampushka, and I've been looking for this old mammoth model of Panasonic for a long time, because for me personally it is ideal

I remember a long time ago, when the Redmond 01 model had just appeared and I had just appeared on this forum, there were fierce disputes in the Redmond thread about where the porridge tastes better in Panasonic or Redmond. And some girl (I'm afraid to make a mistake, but maybe it was Stafa) tried to get through to everyone that Panasonic cooks better. Slippers, tomatoes, bananas and other products flew into it. And I read and thought what a bad girl, but EVERYONE knows better, well, why is she arguing with the obvious and why Panasonic can be better than a modern and beautiful Redik. And I bought myself a P01. And she was happy. And I also wrote laudatory posts until I bought myself Panasonic. And now I often remember those heated arguments, those slippers, those tomatoes and that brave girl who was not afraid to go against everyone and defended her opinion. A flower to her from me
P.S. The topic was later cleared by the moderator

[Larssevsk]

Larssevsk, Thank you! Is it about model 10? And then I smash a lot of barrels on ozone: 10, 18, 102, 181, 182 as I understand the differences only in volume and color? Or is 10 better?

[Pampushka]

Pampushka, the best is what you like. I do not in any way call to buy the 10th Panasonic, because I have no moral right to do this, because I cook ONLY porridge in it!
If someone asks my advice on what to buy only for cereals, then without batting an eye I will advise the 10th Panasonic.
And if someone needs a more versatile device, then you need to think more carefully - what are you going to cook. Do you need frying, do you need a multi-cook, do you need yogurt, etc. Now there are a lot of good toons. Look at design, volume, functionality and price.
I repeat once again, I have Shteba, Philips 3095 and Panasonic 2.5 liters. Together they are perfect

I have a Panasonic and already the second one, I can't say anything bad about it, but I only make baked goods in it. We rarely eat porridge, I like to cook porridge in another mammoth, Toshiba and she also cooks rice perfectly, the quality of this cartoon is much higher, but outwardly it is generally lovely
The most popular and favorite stadler and cuckoo

in another mammoth

So, too, is an old model. Tell me, Nadyush, she is cool, very beautiful

[vernisag]

vernisag, Irish, very cool and beautiful and with a clock, but put the bowl in the sideboard and admire

what to buy only for cereals, without batting an eye I will advise the 10th Panasonic.

+1 for porridge

And I really like MV pressure cookers: Filya 2178 and Moulinex CE-4000. Of course, there are some nuances of use, but overall, I'm very happy!

Girls who need Panasonic 10 have now appeared on Ozone, only not in blue, but in bronze. For 2290, and a cup for him for 990.
Oops, the topic has already unsubscribed on it. Well, okay, maybe someone has not seen the information, I will not delete.
Now is Black Friday, if anyone finds something interesting at a cheaper price - whistle! Suddenly we need.

[Anastasia]

Anastasia, only in Moscow delivery

[Larssevsk]

Larssevsk, yes, now I looked - delivery of the ozone partner, around the city. Ieh, the Muscovites are lucky.

[Pampushka]

Pampushka, I determined for a very long time, bought, sold, presented, bought again. As a result, I left in the apartment 3, in my opinion, ideal multicooker for our purposes - Shtebu, Philips 3095 and Panasonic 10 for cereals. Fffffsё, now cooled down and calmed down. I don’t look at new multicooker anymore. Satisfy mine 100%

Larissa, hello. I have an ancient 18 Panasonic, which is almost 9 years old, the only and favorite. I am planning a move and expansion of the kitchen, for a year now I have looked after the staff for this purpose (a pressure cooker and a primitive sous-vide). Tell us, if possible, why the Phillips is so good that in the company with the Panasonic staff it allows you to be completely content. Thank you.

what is so good about phillips

Maria, copying my old post about Philips 3095
1. She has the best bowl of all that I have seen, and not only in a multicooker, but in dishes in general. It is 4 mm thick and weighs 1.4 kg, it looks pristine new with daily use since May. It is very beautiful visually - when you pour water into it, it begins to shimmer with gold. Plus the bowl has handles.
2. It has a very good uniform heating over the entire surface of the bowl, due to which the porridge acquires a melted taste after an hour or two of simmering
3. The cover is removed from it with a slight movement of the hand and with the same light movement of the hand it is set in place. A removable lid is a rarity for multicooker.
4. She has an excellent steamer from which you can make both an upper steamer and a lower steamer (transformer steamer).
5. Spare bowls are sold to it (including the grill bowl in which I make cutlets)
6. She has excellent sensory programs, including pilaf, and I really love sensory programs
7. She has a very good stewing mode in which in exactly one hour (default time) the dish becomes what we love
8. She can turn off the heating before cooking.
9. It does not absorb odors. And there is no problem that after the soup it is not possible to cook porridge
But this is purely my subjective opinion

[Larssevsk]

Larssevsk Larissa, thank you. I have never considered Phillips in principle for myself. I'll think. But still, you prefer porridge from 10 Panasonic, do I understand correctly?

[Maria]

Maria, I also like Panasonic with multi-cook SR-MHS181WTQ

Added Saturday 26 Nov 2016 11:25 PM

Prefer porridge from 10 Panasonic

Masha, purely because of the size. There are fewer porridge eaters

[Larssevsk]

Larssevsk Larissa, I will think, choose, thanks for the opinion

[Larssevsk]

Larssevsk, you have a typo:

She has the best bowl of all that I have seen, and not only in multicooker, but in dishes in principle. It is 4 mm thick and weighs 1.4 kg,

Native bowl 6 mm
You can buy:
A standard bowl HD3745 (as I understand it, 2 mm), but Phillips did not indicate this in the book
Thick-walled bowl HD3746 - 4 mm
Bowl for frying and grilling HD3747 - Philips did not indicate the thickness in the book either

Girls, tell me where to buy bowls for an old multi Panasonic 18 (but at a normal price, I saw only 4 thousand). I have one both at home and in the country, and in both bowls they have already been peeled off. I like to cook porridge, pilaf and stew meat in them. And I don't want to buy other multi. There is also Shteba, but I don't like porridge and pilaf in it. It seems that they wrote that bowls from Brand are suitable for Panas18, but my cartoon did not close, I had to sell.

[Deva]

Deva Elena, the bowls can be viewed on the multi-bowl website. RU
Somewhere here I read reviews of those who bought that the cups are of good quality. Or watch the Philips Bowls, they all seem to be great.

there they write that these multicooker are the same;
Liberty 900,
Morozerro MMC-0212,
Panasonic TMH, HTW, BTW, TMJ - 18/181
Philips HD 3024/00, 3024/40, 3027/03,
Polaris PMC 0508, PPC 0105AD / 0205AD
Sakura SA-7750, 7754,
SCARLETT SL-1529,
Vitess VS-591,
and in their table you can also see
🔗
🔗

Girls, can you please tell me what you can cook in the Sanyo slow-cooker multi-rice cooker?
I read in the first part of the topic that some student managed to make many dishes in the simplest rice cooker, it turns out that in mine you can cook a lot other than rice?
It's clear to stew and cook on the slow mode, but quickly fry, simmer and cook in which mode?
There are modes for white, brown rice, sushi rice, some kind of Haiga rice, mixed rice, soft, and even tofu and steaming.
There are also some fast and Regular modes.
Help me to understand.)
Thank you.)

[Natalia 78]

Natalia 78, check out these threads:
Risovarka. How to cook.
Rice cooker recipes. Table of contents.
How to cook in Korean Cuckoo rice cookers (exchange of experience regardless of the model)

Risovarka: models, reviews, discussion
Multicooker or Rice Cooker
Good luck exploring your rice cooker capabilities
Oursson MP0707S / RD cookers for 0.7-1 liter (one portion)

[Nataliya]

NataliyaAs far as I understand, you have a full-fledged multicooker and you just need to attach yourself to its programs. Is there an English name for the regimes in it?
I have one of the cartoons called a rice cooker, but it has Baking, and slow, and steam. And I can cook almost everything in it.
In addition to the above links, you can use recipes for other multicooker
And we also have this topic.
https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/in...on=com_smf&topic=200175.0
Here are collected recipes and recommendations for the simplest 2-button rice cooker. in which you can also cook a lot, you have this Prog-rice. And also in Temka there is a link to the English-language channel on Tyube, where you can find a lot of interesting things.
Good luck with learning!

[Deva]

Deva Elena, the bowls can be viewed on the multi-bowl website. RU
Somewhere here I read reviews of those who bought that the cups are of good quality.

Girls who bought bowls for Panasonic 18 on this site? What quality are they? Something I'm looking at the last review from January 2016. All the same, prepaid, will they send it?

I really need help choosing a multicooker.
Of the candidates:
1. Redmond skycooker m800s
2. Redmond RMC-M92S
3. Polaris EVO 0125
4. Polaris EVO 0225

All are controlled remotely via the phone. I want it with this functionality for reasons that you can easily update the firmware, download the recipe via the Internet, and it is easy to set up the cooking program using the touch screen, and not the buttons on the panel of the multicooker itself. But here is a very important point in application support - how convenient is it, how often updates are received, whether the developers have abandoned the application, the site with recipes, etc. Who has operating experience? I lean towards the RMC-M92S, which is more feature-rich than the 800s.

I want it with this functionality

Why do you need this? In any case, the cartoon itself will not wash and cut the food or even throw it into the bowl, you still need to do it with your own hands. In general, I see no point in these bells and whistles for a multicooker, just an extra overpayment.
By the way, buttons are more convenient to use than a sensor

Why do you need this?

the ability to update the firmware (fixes, improvements) and, for example, download downloaded recipes.

[dpatriot]

dpatriot, do you have a slow cooker now? Do you have experience in multicooker cooking?

vernisag, nope, this will be the first

In general, I see no point in these bells and whistles for a multicooker, just an extra overpayment.

I totally agree, Ir
It has long been noticed that the simpler the device, the better the functionality.

Irishki, I agree with you.

Even if I don't use this functionality, it's okay. Are the other characteristics of these CFs normal, or maybe something is not important in them?

this will be the first

Then all the more it is not worth chasing bells and whistles. Try simpler and cheaper first, then you will figure out what exactly you personally need.

the ability to update the firmware (fixes, improvements) and, for example, download downloaded recipes.

If you just want to play with the device, flash, reflash, then yes, of course buy and play
And if you want the multicooker to be your assistant in the kitchen, to cook deliciously, then buy a simple, good, high-quality multicooker. Which will serve you faithfully for many years, without any firmware.

nothing wrong.

Nothing terrible, of course, except overpaid money in vain.
Yes, and, the "brains" of such devices can move out)))

You were advised correctly above, start with a simple MV, then see if you need any fancy.
But I can tell right away - no need!

Why only Redmont in the arena?

[vernisag]

vernisag
that is, these are bad and substandard?

But I can tell right away - no need!

And many of us, who at first were also looking for something ... such, are now happy with their beloved assistants, who really cook deliciously and free us up a lot of time.

Why only Redmont in the arena?

And Polaris. For some reason, other manufacturers do not do remote control.

For some reason, other manufacturers do not do remote control.

Why is it needed? Correctly, the girls said that you still have to buy, cut, and put food in a slow cooker. So why not press a button at the same time?

But I can tell right away - no need!

Well, why, I really love smart multicooker, but from overload, the brains of the multicooker can definitely move out. Superfluous functions are not needed at all I agree Irisha

remote control.

Why is it? No, well, really))) You still need to lay the food yourself.
And programs with a delayed start are available in any MV.
I really never use it, I love fresh.

And Polaris. For some reason, other manufacturers do not do remote control.

Why do you need a remote?

Let me ask you a little differently

No need to look at remote control and price. Of these multicooker, what can you choose?
1. Redmond skycooker m800s
2. Redmond RMC-M92S
3. Polaris EVO 0125
4. Polaris EVO 0225

In general, can anyone have experience with these models or brands in general?

Added Thursday, 08 Dec 2016, 14:00

If these models are not very good (in quality, functionality, convenience), then maybe others will then look

experience with these models

Experience does not depend on the MB model, believe me))))

However, the choice is yours, of course)