Kenwood kitchen machine: working with attachments

Ah, got it. I don't have one. I only have a food processor, there are also discs for shredding and slicing. I don’t chop cabbage with them?

I only have a food processor, there are also discs for shredding and slicing. I don’t chop cabbage with them?

I also only have a food processor.
Shreds well. One problem - you need to empty the bowl, that is, chop in parts. As with any bowl harvester - work is limited to bowl dimensions.

And a high-speed grater - cabbage falls and falls, just substitute the bowls. It is more convenient for large workpieces. But since I personally have rare large blanks, I decided that I would buy a high-speed one at a good price, but I would just do it in parts, filling and emptying the bowl.

Here again, why do you justify the manufacturer. Well, the fact is that there are no pictures, the fact is that it would be more convenient with them. For example, I'm uncomfortable, I have to twist this attachment here and there to aim. Yes, this is a trifle, but this is a manufacturer's flaw. Taking into account the fact that both the harvester and the attachments were not obtained for free, I do not consider it acceptable to forgive the manufacturer. Especially considering that there are plenty of competitors.

Here, and in general in life, people justify not just what they have, but what they love for one reason or another. My friend, having Kitchenade, and having played Kenwood at my place, lamented that some of her pieces were not as convenient as mine, but added that she didn’t care much about Kitchen, because he was red, small, cute and most importantly - she got used and adapted to receive from him the result that she needed.

When people made friends with the technique, it became an extension of their hands, freed up time and energy, and most importantly - it brings joy, and the cooking process goes quickly and without hassle, they do not notice little things like rice.

Bosch even has color marks on which nest.



It's nice, but hardly a person is guided by color after 1-2 uses. He just knows - this attachment for this nest, and this one for that.

Thank you for lowering your negative-aggressive tone. But my personal impression is that you are annoyed and / or offended by this technique, so you will continue to be annoyed by little things, such as missing pictures.

I regularly watch on the forum in different topics about different techniques, when the technique is not fond of - the result is bad. She may not fall in love with both for objective reasons - poor assembly, something breaks, an unpredictable result, etc., and for biased reasons - the family did not understand the waste, got into a rash loan or debt, there is no place in the kitchen, it was not with a self-assembled tablecloth and a magic wand, the food is still not as beautiful and tasty as others.

And when you fell in love, then these are not excuses, but simply really do not notice such non-functional trifles as the absence of pictures. I, for example, for 17 months did not even think about the pictures before your words.

I consider my Kenwood Cooking Chef to be the best for the home.
And all available add. attachments - food processor, blender, mini chopper, cube cutter, mill, soufflake, old flexi - are convenient. I use them regularly.

But the previous units, the same Bosch, for example, I sold.
And, by the way, not because they are bad or I have not made friends, but because Kenwood is better and more convenient for me.

[Angel with horns]

Made spaghetti a matching nozzle today. This is real spaghetti in appearance: the cross section is round. Roll out 5, tried thinner - not that. The children are delighted. In the dough I took first grade flour and semolina semolina.It seemed to us very tasty. And how much pleasure everyone got, making the dough with a hook, and then rolling it and cutting it - beyond words.

I saw, yeah. I tried to upload a photo, but for some reason it did not work from the phone. On the top three it was somehow thick, especially since the dough turned out to be slightly softer than necessary. And on the top five it is)
And I did it in the processor, but quickly, in the morning, before work. And in the evening it turned out to be too cool. I had to add water first, then flour ... Here the hook came in handy

And the blender and the processor will not be thrown back if you knead a steep dumpling dough in them?

Angel with horns, and twist the crumb in the processor, then collect. Blender did it, he didn't even jump too much. Otherwise, the point is in such a machine if it cannot knead dumplings dough?

So the machine can knead, only with the blender I somehow saw a different purpose. But I have not tried it, I argue purely theoretically.

Angel with horns, This method has been described many times on the forum and in the topic. Everything works out great.

And even in the instructions for the Boshev multi-mixer, which is essentially the same as the Kenwood food processor.

Did you hold it in your hands?

Boshevsky not only held, but also washed in the dishwasher and disassembled completely.

there is something to rust.

Found nothing rusting.

[Miranda]

I also only have a food processor.
Excellent chops.

Miranda, and which disk?

[Natusichka]

Natusichkawhich is a fine shredder.

Another highly annoying drawback is the very inconvenient pushers on the high-speed slicer and cube cutter. There is almost no thickening on top (handle) on them, so that it is convenient to take it out. Therefore, if the pusher is lowered to the end, then it literally has to be picked out with nails. The budget boche, and many others, have a mushroom cap on top of the pushers on top - you can pull it out without effort.

Another serious flaw - on the lids of the aforementioned nozzles from the inside, there is a narrow gap of a complex shape between the loading hole and the edge of the lid. Food is always tightly clogged there and you have to pick them out with difficulty. Well, was it really impossible to make a lid without this gap - or move the hole closer to the edge; or vice versa, closer to the center, so that the gap is wider and nothing is hammered into it; or just fill it with plastic. Well, it is not Kenwood that has been making harvesters for several years, why such an ill-considered one.

Regarding the food processor: I don’t understand at all why they buy it and even for that kind of money. For 2-3 times less money, you can buy a whole small combine (Bosch of the 3rd series, Phillips of the base line and others like that) of the same design and about the same functionality. Places will take at least no more.
For example, I bought a Bosch MCM 3110 and bought a free disk for it. All together it came out about 4500. But he has his own engine block for this money. It is very convenient in work.

[zhariks]

zhariks, you may be partly right, but only partly). I am writing only my opinion. I bought a car without reading this topic at all, spontaneously, in the near future, not planning to buy anything like that. In principle, having a combine harvester and a Phillips multi-cutter, as well as a bunch of other things, there was no great need for it, I gave in to an impulse. I began to read the topic only later, yes, there is delight, but there was also talk about cons, so here you are biased all the same. Now to the facts, I repeat once again that everything is IMHO.
The pusher of the cube cutter and the processor is quite normal for me, I have nails, but I don't break anything. Similar and in the harvester, maybe I'm used to it.
It would be nice, of course, to somehow help the user quickly navigate where and what to put, but it's not important at all. here it is generally not very convenient to insert everything, you need to get used to it, but again, this is similar when buying any new technology, even the most elementary one.
The hole, yes, I agree here, very inconvenient, infuriates picks out. But again, my not the cheapest combine has the same problem.But in multi-cut it was implemented much better. Perhaps this is due to the manner in which the lid is snapped in, maybe to fit snugly. But not that big of a problem, honestly.
But I don't agree with you about a food processor about a separate device. I have not a small kitchen at all - 30 squares, but to put another device next to HP, multicooker, etc. - this will not remain at all, there will be a feeling of clutter. But in case of need, it is easier and more convenient to simply quickly put the attachment on the Kenwood. And with my height of 166 cm, no hands to the ceiling.
In addition, we are all different, we all have our own preferences, and it is absolutely impossible for EVERYONE to create an absolutely convenient device. Therefore, there are disadvantages, where can we go without them, but the advantages overlap them completely.
And do not consider it rude, but if you are not satisfied, then get rid of Kenwood and find yourself the car that will satisfy all your aspirations and needs. This is no rudeness.

Boshevsky not only held, but also washed in the dishwasher and disassembled completely.

We are talking about the Kenwood multi-shredder.

another of the very annoying flaws -

very awkward pushers on high speed slicer and cube cutter. There is almost no thickening on top (handle) on them, so that it is convenient to take it out. Therefore, if the pusher is lowered to the end, then it literally has to be picked out with nails. The budget boche, and many others, have a mushroom cap on top of the pushers on top - you can pull it out without effort.

Another serious flaw - on the lids of the aforementioned nozzles from the inside, there is a narrow gap of a complex shape between the loading hole and the edge of the lid. Food is always tightly clogged there and you have to pick them out with difficulty. Well, was it really impossible to make a lid without this gap - or move the hole closer to the edge; or vice versa, closer to the center, so that the gap is wider and nothing is hammered into it; or just fill it with plastic. Well, it is not Kenwood that has been making harvesters for several years, why such an ill-considered one.

Regarding the food processor: I don’t understand at all why they buy it and even for that kind of money. For 2-3 times less money, you can buy a whole small combine (Bosch of the 3rd series, Phillips of the base line and others like that) of the same design and about the same functionality. Places will take at least no more.
For example, I bought a Bosch MCM 3110 and bought a free disk for it. All together it came out about 4500. But he has his own engine block for this money. It is very convenient in work.

If something does not work out for you, it does not mean that it is so for everyone. I perfectly grind nuts (do not even freeze) and sugar.
SO62-Xzhi-k

That is why, for my part, now I am trying to reduce the enchanting mood of this topic, so that the readers have a more objective impression about the attachments and the combine.

In terms of price / quality / functionality, KM Kenwood is objectively the best car.
As for the shortcomings, everyone has them. And Kenwood baits have a huge number of them. Some have already been discussed here. To those mentioned by you, I can add the poor quality of the plastic of the mentioned pusher. One of them crashed when it fell. The plastic could be thicker. The auger of the auger juicer is also not made ice. Juicers that are citrus or centrifugal do not stand up to criticism, and the metal of rubbing rusts.
In general, the attachments are not the strongest and most elaborate theme of CM Kenwood and there are many complaints about them.
But the KM itself, as a dough mixer, is the best of the semi-professional level.

And I am guided by common sense and reason.

Following your logic, everyone who did not notice the absence of pictures, a hat on the pusher, a gap (did not immediately realize what you were, even went to look) - not only are they biased, but also not guided by common sense and reason, praising Kenwood?

Kenwood is praised not for patterns and hats, but for functionality, performance and durability.

But the bullying when working with a food processor - how there is bias
Different height, different height of the work surface, etc.
Price is also a biased factor.

I also disagree about a separate motor. For me personally, on the contrary, one motor is more convenient, because the place and the ergonomics of the kitchen.

I sold the Bosch MCM 64085 for many reasons.
The duplicating technique, takes place, collecting and disassembling Bosch, for me personally, was less convenient than Kenwood. When it came to vegetables in borscht, that is, a couple of onions, carrots, a little cabbage, etc., I did it with Bosch with my hands, because there are a lot of details to wash afterwards, it's harder to assemble, it's easier not to mess with. With the food processor, I stopped completely with my hands.

In addition, in Boche, he pulls under the stick, which is in the center of the bowl. Sausage emulsion and other semi-liquid substances, not to mention liquid ones - through a stick to the motor. It took me several months to adapt to this, but even then, pulling was inevitable, but at least I learned to stop hitting the engine. And it was still a story to clean up.



I took the photo from the review - 🔗

It would be better if Bosch had no rice than such nonsense.
Kenwood's food processor doesn't have anything like that.

***
We discussed here the German review-comparison of Häussler, Ankarsrum, Bosch, Kenwood induction, Kitchenaid, Thermomix. And additionally a hand mixer Krups.

Kenwood kitchen machine: working with attachments # 1825

A very objective review. And not because Kenwood is second only to professional Hasler, with a spinning bowl.

I perfectly grind nuts (I don't even freeze them) and sugar.

Thank you so much for the video!

I tried to take it off myself, but hold the camera (smartphone) with my hands and do it - it was nonsense in terms of the picture, it was twitchy, I didn't understand anything, and when someone else was at home, it was not up to that.

Kneader - as a bonus

Heh
Kenwood is primarily a dough mixer and planetary mixer.

The attachments for it appeared much later than the machine itself.
The cube cutter was released not so long ago, about five years ago it was not yet available. The first generations of food processors were pretty toy and funny. Blenders have changed a lot. Flexy is also from this century. Soufleika is considered a new nozzle, it is only a couple of years old.

If you needed a harvester, you had to buy a harvester.
When a large bowl is advised here as a preferable one, then they are guided by what and how much a person is going to do in the bowl, that is, knead and / or whip. And if you needed attachments, body kits, and a dough mixer with a bonus, then what's the difference which bowl?

[zhariks]

zhariks, this is not a blind defense, but a parrying of your arguments and bringing your own. I am completely satisfied with the car, despite the shortcomings.
And then, you originally needed a harvester, so of course Kenwood cannot suit you, since the harvester has an additional function). And I played enough with combines / blenders / multi-cutters, understood what functions I need and are important, what I want, what is convenient for me to use and what is not, and, choosing attachments, I took these factors into account.

Personally, I first bought Kenwood as a mixer and kneader. Then I looked for information on kenwood and found a bread machine forum. I learned a lot of useful things here. I bought only the ones I needed from the attachments. Dough sheeter, cube cutter, high-speed grater and wiping sieve. All
the rest is free-standing. Chopper, juicers, meat grinder. Even my thoughts were not to buy any more attachments. Nobody agitates anyone. People share their experiences. Who likes pop, who loves. I am very happy with my caches. It is very difficult for me to insert the dough roller, and my daughter inserts it in a minute. So you can see it in me. The only annoying thing is that the bowl sometimes twists very much when kneading the dough. And still I love him dearly.

Personally, I first bought Kenwood as a mixer and kneader

I'm also surprised that someone has a kneader as a bonus. Bought Kenwood when the Bread Maker broke down to knead the dough first. And whisk! What a pleasure it is when technology does it without you, with high quality, and at this time you can do other things.
And I chose without this site for a long time.And Kenwood was at first exorbitantly expensive, almost stopped at Boch, but thanks to my husband, in the end we bought Kenwood. And it already broke (I tried to crush wheat grains in a meat grinder), and under a 3-year warranty they repaired it completely for free.
The only thing that causes confusion is the attachment of the meat grinder. As if something has not been completed yet. But he doesn't have any complaints.
Still, to me, Kenwood is a dough machine, first and foremost.

[zhariks]

zhariks, I think you misunderstand this thread. It was not created to compare with other brands. Most of the users share their experience and ask for tips on how to get the desired result using this technique. Perhaps you should create your own thread for a comparative review of Kenwood and Bosch (not in favor of the former, of course)

[zhariks]

zhariks, you should pay your attention that the body and almost all Kenwood nozzles are made of metal. For me, it was a matter of principle, since I was fed up with plastic. Will fall to the floor and smithereens.

Here again, there were mixed reviews about the convenience / inconvenience of a large size. I will write my opinion - NOT CONVENIENT. ...
And the second inconvenience is, as I said above, the nozzles for the high-speed socket are too high. Around shoulder level. Therefore, the hand has to be raised and with prolonged work the hand becomes numb / tired. For low combine harvesters, the hand presses down, helping with its weight. And it turns out much easier.

Here I agree. I have Sens and 070. So Sens works constantly, and induction is more idle.
The small and compact Sens is obviously more convenient.

[zhariks]

zhariks, not tired of walking in circles?
I suggest that in one post you collect all your claims to your KM Kenwood model and to specific attachments.
It is very useful if there are illustrations - a photo indicating a specific inconvenience / lack of thought.
I will gladly place a link to this extremely useful post of yours on the first page so that no one accidentally passes by it.
I will, of course, clean up the rest of the rumors, and not only yours.
If not you, then others know that I am gradually clearing the topic, combining posts by topic and removing the "water".
Therefore, if you do not want your opinion to get lost, try to formulate it compactly and reasonably.
Good luck!

[Michael]

Worktop height is standard.
My growth is not small. But even that is not convenient for me. My wife is small - she only uses a stool. Well, or put the combine on a stool

Michael, I have a harvester on a bar counter, the height of which is not less than a meter, height 170 cm, not a young age and in the past a complex fracture of the collarbone of the working right hand, but it is convenient for me! Yes, and the clogging gap in the lid does not infuriate, it takes a couple of seconds to clean it, it's not difficult when you saved a lot of time while Kenwood was working. And not to say that I had little technique to melt from the first sensations. And the big bowl suits, although if there was a small induction, then it would have acquired it for itself, but now I will not give up the big one for anything. Sell ​​your kenwood at a flea market, as you were advised, all the same, with this attitude, nothing good will come of it.

I suggest that in one post you collect all your claims to your KM Kenwood model and to specific attachments.
It is very useful if there are illustrations - a photo indicating a specific inconvenience / lack of thought.
I will gladly place a link to this extremely useful post of yours on the first page so that no one accidentally passes by it.

I made such comparisons on cyturosavka in particular. And the rust of the rubbing lies somewhere, if it has not been rubbed, and the juicer auger scattered to smithereens. All this can be collected and placed in one place, but it is better not at the beginning of this topic, but in Miranda's reference topic.

[just for you]

The small and compact Sens is obviously more convenient.

Pavel, I will be grateful to you if you, like other participants in the discussions, will clarify that Small and compact Sens is obviously more convenient just for you.
I, for example, gradually got rid of everything "small and compact", which duplicates my Keshu, because he I have stationary on the table, and everything small and compact was spread out in the corners, therefore to me it is easier and more convenient to work with Kesha when possible than to get other devices.

In addition, a big request to all panellists with zhariks:
Mikhail simply draws you into a pointless conversation in a circle, because there are already several pages of the same fairy tale about the white bull.
Does he really want the last word for him? Give a strong (?) Man such pleasure, it's a pity, or what
But me, a weak woman, is different: do not add oil to his fire. Just skip it if it doesn't match your opinion.
Because of his posts, you won't run to sell your Kesha, will you? However, he, it seems, too.
And we will each stay with his own - someone is happy and writes about it, someone is not happy, and also writes. But not 10 times, please.
I will not go into explanations anymore - I will just clean out the messages to dryness.
Good luck!

I made such comparisons on cyturosavka in particular. And the rust of the rubbing lies somewhere, if it has not been rubbed, and the juicer auger scattered to smithereens. All this can be collected and placed in one place

Yes, Pavel, thanks, it was very helpful.
I am slowly gathering it all together.
But I will make links in the glossary, and an additional topic that Miranda has kindly agreed to create is exactly a guide to the car and components - there are only names, articles and compatibility, - no discussions and emotions.

This is where and how?
For convenience, it can still make a tree-like architecture of the topic and links to everything that concerns, for example, give cube cutters in the cube cut section.

This will not work, because many messages concern not only one nozzle, there are comparisons, and recipes come across, and so on.
Therefore, I sometimes take away many messages for quotes, and also duplicate them by branches - generally gloom.
When I make a glossary, I hope everything will be clear and convenient to the links. It's a matter of time - be patient.

[zhariks]

zhariks, you should pay your attention that the body and almost all Kenwood nozzles are made of metal. For me, it was a matter of principle, since I was fed up with plastic. Will fall to the floor and smithereens.

but here I strongly disagree!
I compare with Kitchenade nozzles - a meat grinder and a plastic shredder.
These are just lovely attachments, firstly, the quality of the plastic is excellent, it can withstand drops. Secondly, you can wash in the PMM !!!
Thirdly, lightweight and compact. I love them!
Plastic can be of different quality, a transparent plastic glass from a Kitchenade blender is mine in pm, constantly! Has a pristine appearance, unlike attachments from a simple blender. After the first wash, they were covered with micro-scratches.

Twig, in this case you are writing about equipment of the same price category as Kenwood, where high-quality plastic is assumed, and the previous comparison referred to plastic parts of combines of a lower price category.

Small and compact Sens

Small and compact Sens only in some of its dimensions is less than 10-11 centimeters, it seems. I have not a Sens, but a Chef Titanium, but also "small and compact", but not enough to make it stand non-stationary. With this kitchen layout, I would not have gotten anywhere else.
And, in general, everyone expresses only their own opinion, right?
Yes, it is convenient that it is stationary. And (in my case) more convenient than Bosch, which was originally planned. Simply by architecture, location of nests.
Convenient 1500 watts power. Convenient mixer. Actually, because of him and bought. But the nozzles were planned immediately. Food, multi-shredder, screw press juicer and blender.It so happened that with all the promotions (take the 4th - 5th as a gift), bonuses and the need to implement "thanks", a wiping sieve, a meat grinder, a centrifugal juicer and a slow shredder were formed.
Only the centrifugal juicer is very, very unhappy. Something strange for such a well-thought-out technique, twice I approached it and both times nothing came of it.
In general, a slow shredder was not really needed - a food processor is enough. But this is my thoughtlessness.
In principle, I like the wiping sieve more than the auger juicer, but this is for my purposes so far. I am delighted with the sieve.
Until she made friends with the souffleika, in any way.
Yes, we have all the equipment separately, up to multi-cutting with cubes. There was no meat grinder - there was a processor. But I got really tired of standing with a hand mixer, whipping everything, kneading and beating minced meat (and for ham it takes a long time), manually chopping vegetables / herbs or taking out a multi-cutter because of a couple of carrots or apples. And have a bunch of motors, and get tangled up in the wires. Now I have given something, something is lying on the mezzanine. Remained a submersible blender, a separate dough roller, well, and a coffee grinder.
Difficulties in connection arose in the first hours, so I got to this forum thread. But somehow they quickly resolved - now everything is on the machine.
I won't buy any more nozzles, I wanted a potato peeler, but it's not released, so, like, and the reviews are not ah.
A mill - so the amount of additional flour that is needed, the multi-chopper makes me quite well.
Olga VB, this answer is not for you, of course, but just an opinion about Kenwood. It is more convenient for me than individual items.

In principle, I like the wiping sieve more than the auger juicer, but this is for my purposes so far. I am delighted with the sieve.

On the good, these are complementary devices. For example, you can completely squeeze the juice-puree from a tomato only sequentially: first on a screw, and then through a fine sieve.

[Paul I]

Paul I, hmm, haven't tried it. From boiled tomatoes I just made a wiping sieve with small holes. Well, not fast, but somehow it itself. I didn't need a crude one yet. Why is it better?

Paul I, hmm, did not try. From cooked tomatoes, I just made a wiping sieve with small holes. Well, not fast, but somehow it itself. I didn't need a crude one yet. Why is it better?

Yes, because a rather wet cake comes out of the auger. Well, that is, at first it is dry, but as the holes are clogged, it becomes more and more wet. Often disassembling and washing the sieve is quite laborious. And squeezing wet cake on a sieve is easier and the quality of squeezing is higher.
As a result, a liter of juice is obtained from a kg of tomatoes.

a liter of juice is obtained from kg of tomatoes

Wonders when you consider that a liter of juice also weighs kg
That is, there is no cake at all, does it completely dissolve?
Incidentally, my sieve was not clogged enough to have to be stopped and cleaned. True, I downloaded it in parts, but quite a lot.

Wonders when you consider that a liter of juice also weighs kg
That is, there is no cake at all, does it completely dissolve?

Well, I didn't weigh up to a gram, but the cake is so dry practically weighs something in the range of 20-30 g, or maybe less. Well, really, how much can a tomato peel weigh, even with a kg? And the seeds?

Incidentally, my sieve did not clog so much that it had to be stopped and cleaned. True, I downloaded it in parts, but quite a lot.

The question here is the amount of processed products. We usually recycle the box at a time. Well, the variety of tomatoes matters.
And if not cleaned, the cake is definitely wet, even if it clogs up a little.

I made satsebeli. Rubbed through a coarse sieve. And there, in addition to tomatoes, Bulgarian and hot peppers and garlic. I poured the sieve halfway. From the beginning at 1 speed. Gradually, the speed increased to the maximum. Rubbed 15 kg of tomato and 4 kg of pepper with garlic. Everything was rubbed perfectly. Nothing was hammered. Not a single seed slipped through. The cake was completely dry.



True, the vegetables were all boiled.

Sorry, just yesterday or the day before yesterday, it seems in this thread I read about the fact that the dough on dumplings is made in a blender, I looked for this method here and did not find it ((maybe someone will show where they wrote about this, or if it does not make it difficult, they will tell you again how it is to do? and why can't I make dough on dumplings with a hook? I was going to do it ...

[Margitte]

Margitte, Dumplings dough without kneading in 21 seconds! (dough for dumplings with knives in a food processor) + video
Take a look here. I kneaded with a hook.

[Margitte]

Margitte, There is no blender. I always use a hook on dumplings and khinkali. 500 grams of flour, 1 egg, 200 grams of water, 1 tsp of salt. First, I knead at a low speed for about 5 minutes. I turn it off for 20 minutes to make the gluten work. I do this 3 times. Then I slightly increase the speed. The dough is pretty dry. I put it in a saucepan and cover it with a lid. After 2 hours, the dough is soft and elastic. I roll it out on a dough sheeter. There is almost no need to add flour.

[Margitte]

Margitte, Put sifted flour, salt, water in a bowl (if you make with an egg, then an egg) - according to the recipe, which you usually turn on and it kneads with knives just instantly.
I make the noodle dough like this: 1 egg + 100 grams of flour + a pinch of salt. The dough is great!
Then I visit him in a package and after about 30 minutes - an hour I work with him.
Here, Lena has already given a link.

[Margitte]

Margitte, the hook comes out better!
Express method for those with low-power equipment

Can you tell me if it is better to grind the curd cheese with a rubber nozzle (flexi is it called?) Or through a sieve?
Maybe someone compared.

Everything was rubbed perfectly. Nothing was hammered. Not a single seed slipped through. The cake was completely dry.

The sieve (mesh) of the screw juicer is clogged. This is the conversation.

[Paul I]

Paul I, Pavel, I'm sorry, I didn't understand.

Margitte, the hook comes out better!

A twig, I'd bet. I really like the quality of the kneading with knives, not to mention the speed.

Is it better to grind cottage cheese for curd cakes with a rubber nozzle (is it called flexi?) or through a sieve?

Unambiguously through a sieve - a small lattice with pimples up. The curd turns out to be very homogeneous, airy

The sieve (mesh) of the screw juicer is clogged.

Moreover, it makes no sense to first twist on the auger, and then wipe through a sieve - isn't it better to exclude the auger from this process and not steam.

[Paul I]

Paul I, Thank you. I'll try this way, maybe more effective. But, in general, the dryness of the cake after the sieve suits me. But I don’t make industrial preparations either - just for sauce. Well, I did a little of all sorts of fruit and berry jellies for some reason - I got it.
I will definitely try your method if you need to wipe raw tomatoes.

I really like the quality of the kneading with knives, not to mention the speed.

Dumplings would never have come up with knives. That's it!
And the sandy one is excellent, but I rehearsed it with an old low-power processor. Just seconds - and a crumb. Or is it a blender? Missed ...

small lattice with pimples up.

And I like it big, too.

A twig, I'd bet. I really like the quality of the kneading with knives, not to mention the speed.

Olya, this is if you have a precisely adjusted proportion. I very rarely got into perfect proportion. It is a little dry, then a little wet. It seems that you will remember the ideal proportion, but then instead of water you pour kefir, then a small egg will fall, so it knocks out. And adding flour or liquid in the process is terribly inconvenient. When Kitchen was at my house, I was making dough for noodles with knives in a foot processor. This work was a burden for Kitchen. Although they claim that the engine of the car is super powerful.
But Kenwood 096, surprisingly, very easily kneads the dough with a hook. My good girl :))

[Margitte]

Margitte, Dumplings dough without kneading in 21 seconds! (dough for dumplings with knives in a food processor) + video
Take a look here. I kneaded with a hook.

I tried this recipe with a blender, it somehow hummed hysterically and the burning smell went off. Disconnected immediately, there is no desire to repeat. Moreover, the hook perfectly kneads any dumpling dough.

Paul I, I'm sorry Paul, I didn't understand

Forgive me, I must have explained it poorly.
Olya, what sieve did you mean?
"And vi, tovarisch Poskrebyshev, who did they mean?" (from)

Sieve-wipe

Moreover, it makes no sense to first twist on the auger, and then wipe through a sieve - isn't it better to exclude the auger from this process and not steam.

There is a meaning, and this is what it is. The sieve is good for soft foods, but does not work well with hard and raw foods. So, it is better to first turn the product into a soft, homogeneous mass. True, of course, this can be done not with an auger, but with a blender, for example, or a meat grinder.
So, it will hardly be possible to cope with one rubbing in the case of tough cheap tomatoes. Well, then there is room for creativity.

Maybe not news?
I saw that on Kenwood. ru now a 15% discount on everything, they write.
The code word must be entered. EXTRA15

Help me please, I can’t figure out how to connect a cube-cutting attachment, maybe some adapter is needed, I bought it in Germany, I have a car 096