Polaris pressure cookers

I also think that she is not my own.
People, maybe you’ll figure out something over the weekend, how to drive pictures into a computer - so put it here. I am planning to drive up on Tuesday-Wednesday.

[azaza]

I also think that she is not my own.
People, maybe you’ll figure out something over the weekend, how to drive pictures into a computer - so put it here. I am planning to drive up on Tuesday-Wednesday.

azaza, Tanya! go to any techno market - there these Panasonic - find it yourself, or rather (I still do not understand - why do you need a photo, is it not in full size, or did I miss something?) and if they write that it fits in Panasonic - that is, expendable for Panasonic, it means that it is so. ? no? and even if they are of the type of Brand, then it's better.

I don't have techno-markets near my side, and I'm too lazy to drag myself somewhere. In the photo, you can more or less see the coating - if not the quality, then at least the approximate color.
And I don't even dare to hope for the brand's coverage. I just quietly dream to myself But I will take it, even if the coverage is far from Brand. I already have something, if only the dimensions fit. I'll arm myself with a centimeter and accurate measurements of my pot wound.
In general, the abundance of spare pots for bread makers at this point is surprising. To the cartoons of the current to 4, and they have heaps of bread buckets, and mixers for them too (but nevertheless, for our HP, there is a 938). In this case, the agitators have a definitely different coating. This means that it is clearly not a self-propelled gun - otherwise, everything would have the same coverage.
In short, what to guess. On the trail. I’ll jump up for a week, see and feel.

In short, what to guess. On the trail. I’ll jump up for a week, see and feel.

I went, looked, felt, even bought it. And today I took it back.
Here they are both, two side by side, ours on the right
If the side was flat and at the lower height, it would fit. But the side is multicooker, profile. The lid did not close! And so I tulil her, and that way
The coating in this saucepan is exactly the same as Orion's, that is, it is not very fountain. But I was ready for that, if only I would come up. But

Well, I’m completely confused: does a bowl from Panas 18 fit our polka or not? otherwise I almost ordered a bowl from Panasonic, and for my cartoon it is definitely not in size ...

First Snow, that cup was Panas's cousin, if not second cousin. So I won't say about my own. Judging by Pinky's experience, the native Panasovskaya works great in Polaris.

That is, it was not intended for Panasonic 18? I also want to order not my own, but they write that it is suitable for Panasik, and therefore for our polaris? Or, in the light of recent events, it is not known if it will fit? Probably, I shouldn't risk it yet ...
Damn, I love my pressure cooker so much, but here's her saucepan

Damn, I love my pressure cooker so much, but here's her saucepan

+1000! I have the same feelings.
Perhaps the saucepans that I measured will suit Panas. Panas has a slightly different cover. The seller announced that he was supposedly suitable for Panas, whether this is really so - I do not know. I don't have Panas, and there is no opportunity to try this saucepan on him either.
I myself don't know what to do. So I hoped for this saucepan! Her coverage is lousy - well, okay, I would have taken it anyway. I have no time for a choice, I would have at least one, if only the pressure cooker would accept it. But no

[azaza]

azaza

Here they are both, two side by side, ours on the right

You have a silver bowl for Polaris on the outside ??? My bowl is completely black both inside and outside. Maybe that's why you have such a poor quality. My bowl is from June and is still like new.

[azaza]

azazaYou have a silver bowl for Polaris on the outside ??? My bowl is completely black both inside and outside. Maybe that's why you have such a poor quality.My bowl is from June and is still like new.

So that's where the dog rummaged! I have pure luminous, not covered with anything. And inside I have it already not black, gray is closer to dark, but not dark.

[azaza]

azaza

Here, most likely, your complaints grow from here: your coverage, apparently, is either experimental or "pirated". I read you and was amazed, I remember, because I have pies, rice, and meat - nothing ever even stuck to the bottom, let alone burn!

I got into the beginning of the topic. Here are pictures of Pink's pan:

Here is a photo from the phone. Not very high quality, but there are no other URLs = https: //Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/r-image/r.1/F/i069./1203/03/debb4c2a96ad.jpg.html]

I have the same. Right now, I went again to my saucepan and looked, and it turned out that I had lied: inside it was almost black. In general, the same as Pinky's.
Girls, who has what saucepans, answer me!

I have exactly the same as in the photo of Pinky, the coating inside is the same as on the day of purchase.

Is it that it turns out that for Russia with a different coating is imported?

My bowl is black on both sides, only the first week did not burn, and then off we go

My bowl is black on both sides, only the first week did not burn, and then off we go

I draw a conclusion: with pots - as luck would have it, does not depend on the color. There is marriage in both black and silver.

May I come to you? : rose: The second week went with my pressure cooker. I master it every day. I'm happy with everything, except for pilaf. Maybe the second time will work out. And about the bowl, from the first preparation, the second dishes at the bottom of the saucepan are sticky, and the milk porridge too. But I thought that it should be so: (My saucepan is dark.

Hello! Can I come to you ???
Yesterday I became the owner of the Polaris 0105 multicooker-pressure cooker ...... I carefully read all the messages in this thread ..... Thank you very much for the advice.
Today I cooked milk rice porridge. It turned out very tasty !!!!!! Nothing burnt (cooked in milk and water 50/50) 2 measuring cups from multi Krasnodar rice. True, for some reason the milk turned out to be under the lid (I took it apart, washed it), but nothing flowed through the valve ...

My bowl is black on both sides. Still nothing burns mmm. Porridge can sometimes stick a little, but this is not a burn, but just kind of stuck. Washed off elementary. With my sponge, including sometimes the hard side. All OK. And here's another question. I have model 0205 and azaza has 0105. My model seems to be more recent. Maybe this is the case? And yet - I tried to insert a bowl from Panas into Polaris. Does not close. That is, the sizes 0105 and 0205 are also somewhat different.
I am friends with Polaris every day. Poor Panasik is resting almost forgotten .. Only when I have to use porridge for the morning on the timer or sometimes a biscuit ..

[tuskarora]

I have a 105 model and the Panasov bowl does not fit it either. I would like to see a photo of someone with a Panasonic saucepan that still fits in a pressure cooker. By the way, I have four multicooker and none of the saucepans are interchangeable.
By the way, tuskarora, your model is not later, but just different in design and slightly higher price.
My pressure cooker is over a year old, I use it not too often, but regularly. Plaque in a saucepan forms white, food sometimes sticks, but when soaked it easily comes off, the coating is not damaged (yet).
At the same time, I must say that in the vaunted frying pan, the neva-dishes Titan also adhere exactly, soak, but the coating is all bumpy and disheveled, everything is scratched.

This Polaris is a strange device! All pots are of different quality. Why, they even differ in appearance. And, it seems, in size, or something: here, too, Panas's saucepan did not close. True, in my case Panasovskaya was not native.
And my plaque is white, that is, I don't have it, it's strange True, a saucepan and without it ugly taka
But the unit itself ... I read a lot about other pressure cookers, and everyone is a little annoying - not like Polaris. Either I just got used to it, or it is the most comfortable. Rather, I got used to it.

floran, you are not quite right.Not only the design and price differ, but also the functionality of the models. I have a baking function you do not have. And the time indicators of the modes are different. The first page of the theme shows this.

And the fact that the unit itself is convenient is definitely. Everything is thought out and simple. And the cooking time is also one of the fastest. I've also read about other models - the same oursson, for example, and I just don't understand why more time is spent on the same dishes in Polaris.

Girls! I have a 105 Polaris model. Well, honestly, pots with Panasonic are completely interchangeable! I change them all the time! It happens that I put Polaris in Panasonic and cook in it. It closes a little tighter (or so it seems to me), but CLOSES and cooks perfectly fine. And I constantly use a saucepan from Panasik in a pressure cooker, because now I often cook in it and one family is clearly not enough. I will specially photograph both in both devices and try to expose the photo. (as soon as my son chooses the time and shows me how to use my new phone, otherwise I still can't figure out how to overtake pictures from him on a computer - well, my computer does not accept them, at least crack it)
Probably, there are still differences in size, but they are not so global that this does not interfere with their interchangeability. Well, I have other pans or what ???
And white bloom in my saucepan also happens after washing, and also not always. And food sticks, it happens. It was, and I fried the pilaf thoroughly - but it was also soaked and washed.
Now I went, tried to insert-change the pots in places - well, no difference in closing! I will find a ruler - I will photograph it in height. And the covers BOTH close completely without effort.

Lud, so I didn’t question your info about interchangeability. I emphasized: I tried to insert non-native a saucepan. I'm not sure if it will fit Panas himself, as advertised. In general, I got the impression that they all have the same size pots, but they are declared as Panasovsky, Aurora, Orion and for Yummi.So I was not surprised when at home I found that the lid with this pan did not close even with good physical influence. The sledgehammer, however, I did not try to use

Tanya, so I have nothing against. It's just that the girls write here that they tried on a Panasonic saucepan and it didn't fit. Now I was spinning around them, taking a picture, and I will try to put the photo again. I put two side by side - they are the same in height, put one on one side (on top) - the SAME diameter, put bottom to bottom - there is a small difference in configuration. And I cook in them all the time. So, probably, non-native saucepans are different, but the native PANASONIKOVSKAYA is uniquely suitable. Why would I lie? Don't know why girls don't fit. Well I say - and it closes absolutely without effort.

Luda, is Panasovskaya's side smooth, like Polaris, or with a wave, like most (if not all) multicooker? Because she, non-native, she would have come up and closed, if not for this wave. It was just 1-1.5 mm waves that prevented the lid from closing.

The Panasovskaya saucepan has a side rounded with a roller outward, round like that, but this does not affect the comparative size of the pots. If you put one on one side, then there is no difference in diameter and there is no difference in the height of the saucepan next to it, as I said, a tunic in a tunic. So the shape of the side doesn't seem to matter here. Well, I can't insert pictures, even though I cry. So visually everything would be clear at once. Nothing, I'll post it later anyway.
And further. After all, there is a sealing gum in the Polaris lid, perhaps due to it, when sealing, the saucepan sits normally.
Now I am baking buns in a saucepan from Polaris in Panasik - everything is fine, it closes and the sides do not interfere. And yesterday in Polaris in a Panasikovsky pan I made a stew and no problems with closing

That is, there are no differences in height in the Panas side? It's just a little bulging, right? The one I measured with a curly rim. Yes, and I have both multi with the same sides.
Anyway.I still will not buy my own Panasov pans for Polaris. It's easier to buy a new pressure cooker.

In the Panasikovsky saucepan, the wall at the top in front of the rim is curly - like a chamfer so rounded with a recess. Is that what you mean? Polaris has a straight wall from the top. But this does not prevent the lid from closing.

Look, there are three saucepans with different sides:

left - rounded side
on the right - flat (pressure cooker)
top - curly

Does Panas have one like on the left?
The one I tried to fit to Polaris had such a bart as the top one.

My Panasik has a rim shape like the top one in your photo, except that the notch is slightly smaller. Although, maybe this photo distorts. But the form is just that. So I don’t know why you didn’t fit.

In Polaris, the heating element is kind of like a spring. When you insert a saucepan and press it, you can feel it. When you insert a Panasik saucepan, when you close it you press it by turning the lid and everything is wonderful.

floran, you are not quite right. Not only the design and price differ, but also the functionality of the models. I have a baking function you do not have.

I also have a baking function, of course (and the instructions are spelled out, and the recipes were attached!) The functionality is described in different ways (these are different models!), But in fact it is not much different.
As for Oursson, if I remember correctly, there are several levels of pressure. Those modes where the pressure is lower take longer. In my opinion, these are completely superfluous pribluda, but the buyer should have a choice!

[floran]

floran In 105 models pressure cookers Polaris no baking function. Did you mean the multicooker?

[buttons]

Well yes! I'm sorry, of course buttons no baking! I bake, setting an arbitrary time of 50-60 minutes. Casserole 30 min. T. h. function there is baking!

[floran]

floran, or you can in more detail what exactly and how you bake in your pressure cooker. Otherwise, I tried the casserole once, so at first it could not gain pressure, and then it gave an error and refused to turn on. I didn't torture her anymore.

Florent, how do you bake, with the valve open? There are recipes with pastries in the booklet, but I realized that this was for model 0205, probably one book was released for two models .. However, I saw in similar pressure cookers Unit, Landlife girls baked, with an open valve and started the Porridge mode twice.

I baked the casserole on porridge (25 minutes) and arbitrarily choosing the time. Charlotte randomly for 50-60 minutes. With a closed valve. In general, I have more baked goods in the nra multicooker, and even better in the oven. Hell only 3-4 times, for a long time and for the sake of experiment. I don't really remember the process, because I closed it and left. How she was gaining pressure there - I don't know. I came - there was no more pressure, I opened the lid and took out the pastries. Quite ready for yourself.
In fact, I adore the pressure cooker for meat broths, soups (pea - mnyam !!!), any meat in it turns out awesome and the stewed cabbage is all ready from top to bottom, not like in a cartoon, the bottom is ready, the top is raw, you need to mix a couple times, time to add; I am silent about the stove, and still strives to burn all the time!

Girls, I’m this one here ... I’m sorry. Today I specially inserted the Panas casters into Polaris once again. I checked everything carefully, straightened the ring. The mustache closed.
I don't know why it didn't work last time. Maybe the inner lid is somehow not right. So the native Panasovskaya casserole fits the polaris. Look.

[Pinky]

From it! I wanted to write exactly the same thing!
Especially I took out all my casseroles and tried them on with each other. Panasonic is included in Polaris and vice versa too! Only the Polaris can hardly be squeezed into the Panasik and moves like this ... just rubs against the walls. But it moves and turns! And the lids are closing!
And why didn’t it sit down at the first fitting?
Pinky , take our mistrust back, sorry!

Well, thank God, we figured it out. And then I was already going to put up pictures (today I tortured my son with my phone, I finally showed how to overtake photos on the computer.) I was really upset - well, why do my pots change safely,others don't
So we cook, girls, and we are not afraid. And I, mabut, will order myself a Panasikov saucepan as a spare

Lyudochka, hello.

And I, mabut, will order myself a Panasikov saucepan as a spare

Where are you going to order a pan of Panasonic? I also need 2 pieces. There are 430-450 UAH, somehow expensive. Maybe eat cheaper?

Anya, sun, hello! We didn’t communicate for a hundred years. Only today I got to the computer - we sat without light for almost two days, so I did not answer right away. Somewhere I had a bookmark for a company in which these pots were 404 UAH each. I couldn't find anywhere cheaper than four hundred. I also wanted to order a bucket for my HP there.
It just wasn't absolutely necessary for the order yet. I will look, find and send you an address (unless, of course, prices have changed there).
You have not adjusted your ICQ there yet?

And I'm about the bowls.
There is a spare saucepan for Liberty-900 (which is a clone of Polaris 0205). In theory the spare wheel should also fit Polaris 0205. And again, theoretically can go to 0105. Or maybe not
Question: is there not a resident of the glorious city of Khmelnitsky among the owners of Polaris? It would be nice to first try on these pots for a pressure cooker, and then write them out.
The size of the saucepan (according to the seller): height 14 cm, diameter at the top 23.5 cm, at the bottom 20 cm, looks the same as all similar ones: black with a non-stick coating.

Especially I took out all my casseroles and tried them on with each other. Panasonic is included in Polaris and vice versa too! Only the Polaris can hardly be squeezed into the Panasik and moves like this ... just rubs against the walls. But it moves and turns! And the lids are closing!

And I'm about the bowls.

And I about the bowls ...
Now, if the owner of Liberty was found among the owners of Panasonic ... Well, if Liberty is an analogue of Polaris and if the app. the bowl will fit in Polaris, it can also fit in Panasonic. And I already want Liberty. And bowls for 90 UAH from Liberty, but I also want suitable for Panasonic ...

My hour has come! And on my street a gingerbread truck turned over
Last night I paid for a saucepan, and today at lunchtime it was in my mail
The saucepans are not identical! By the height of the tunic to the tunic

The diameter of the pots is also the same. But the side of the native saucepan is half a centimeter wider. These are saucepans on top of each other, new on top

Well, inside

The main difference: the weight of the native saucepan is 540 g, the "cousin" - 725 g. I don't know if this will affect its lifespan, but the difference in weight is felt even without the scales.
The saucepan sat in the nest like a native, the lid was closed without tension (but also without any backlash unnecessary here). Despite a slight difference in the width of the side, the pressure accumulated, the program worked out as needed
There was no blotch with the name of the coating (which I barely tore off from my own pan). How the coating will behave in work is still unknown. According to the law of meanness, I will not cook in it in the next couple of days, roles have already been distributed among other devices. I didn't think that the package would arrive so mind-blowingly soon

Summary: you can take

The seller worked more than promptly! The saucepan came quickly and in perfect condition.
Lyud, maybe this will suit you and Panas? The difference is solely in the side and in weight. In weight - for the better And the side in the cartoon, I think, does not play a special role.

Thank you, now I will go through the links. No, if I take it, it’s for a pressure cooker - I’d better take a spare tire for it. And Panasik suits me anyway. Although I think that due to the wider side of your new saucepan, the Panas lid may not close.

No, Lyud, exactly the opposite: the side of the native pan is wider. Native on the side 24 cm, and the new 23.5.

In fact, the difference of 5 mm is significant. But, if you have already tried it and the pressure cooker works fine, then this width is covered by the sealing rubber.
Looked at the links. The first is the pressure cooker, right? And the second saucepan, only without a photo? The price is too attractive - 100 UAH.I understand, delivery from Khmelnitsk?
Are there any differences in the quality of the coating?

The price is very good
Sideboard atnot half a centimeter, but a quarter - half a centimeter is obtained on the entire outer diameter. I was terribly afraid that because of this, the pressure would not be accumulated, the steam would whistle somewhere. But no, everything is great
Cover ... I don't know, I'm afraid to say something already. Smooth, pleasant to the touch. With a slight sparkle. By the way, there is a coating on the outside of the saucepan. A native saucepan has a rougher coating, without a spark.
For the sake of interest, I pulled out a Liberton saucepan, weighed: 692 grams against 725 grams of a new one. But the cover in Liberton is darker, though not black.
I do not know what to say. Only time will tell how good the coverage is. But the saucepan itself looks more solid than its own. Or is it so dear to me