Choosing a multicooker, pressure cooker, rice cooker (2)

Which model?

We offer four: Saturn ST-MC9180 (5 liters) / ST-MC9181 (6 liters) / ST-MC9184 (5 liters) / ST-MC9185 (5 liters) -

I mean Saturn C9184 (5L) I am his

It would be more correct to go to a nearby shopping center and pick up half a dozen models for the price and experience, and here they will help you choose from them.

Thank you, it will be more accurate

The largest selection of bowls is from a specialized manufacturer - the company NEK, but I did not find Saturn in their list. A brand that is not very popular with us, maybe that's why.

Saturn is very well suited for a bowl from dex 40

Thanks for the advice, went to the store

Saturn is very well suited for a bowl from dex 40 ...

Unfortunately, DEX brand products are not offered on the Russian market.

At one time, I looked closely at Dex DMC-60, it was already with a multi-cook and then it was fantastically cheap in Ukraine (compared to the local prices for analogues).

[Manna]

Manna

It's up to you I have already voiced my preferences within the framework of your requirements for the multicooker

Thanks for your recommendations.
It turns out that there are basically two of them.
- Brand 701
- Stadler Form Chef One SFC.909
The first one, as I found, indicates as a disadvantage - The model does not have a condensate collector, moisture accumulates on the rim of the case, which is extremely inconvenient.
Is this really very critical?
This same lack is indicated for the second applicant, who, however, does not have a multi-cook.
The first option costs 2900 rubles. plus the second bowl recommended by you - a total of 4000 rubles
The second option is cheaper - if all in two cups - then about 3000 rubles

When I read the reviews I saw POLARIS PMC 0515AD. She has both a multi-cooker and a non-stick bowl and a container for condensation. The price is about 2500 rubles.

Don't you like this option?

[ame]

Is this really very critical?

No, this is not so important. Not all multicooker with a drip tray has condensation in the drip tray.
In general, this is a matter of personal preference - some people like drip pans and wash them, others like that condensation gets on the rim and wash it.

We were choosing between three rubles and four-liter multicooker. ame, Have you started looking in the direction of five-liter?

Volume is not very critical for me
If the price is the same, it turns out that I don't overpay for it
Still, the main thing is ease of use - if the size is a little larger - well, okay, it doesn't scare

Or is Polaris of less quality from your point of view?

I still emphasize once again that the main thing is convenience.
I don't really understand why volume is so important. If it is too small, then of course - this is significant, and if it is a little large, then there is no problem.

Or is Polaris of less quality from your point of view?

No, the quality of Polaris, Redmond, Brand is of the same order. Stadler has a much better bowl. If you choose between Polaris and Redmond, then Polaris is the preferable price - it is more real. In Polaris, all the latest models are similar. 33 (conditionally, of course) modes, duplicating one another. Why are there so many? The more modes, the more you can choose which one you need right now. The fewer buttons you press, the more convenient it is to use, don't you agree? Therefore, there is no point in chasing regimes. From Polaris I can only recommend 0517 (latest version) and 0531, because these models are time-tested, and you can buy non-stick bowls for them.

Mann, but I couldn't do anything with myself, after Ozon messed up and gave me a 10% discount, 250 rubles and free shipping, I ordered a Panasonic SR-TMH18LTW for 1800. As a result, it cost 1500 rubles.Well, I like the pot in it and the swimmer from it is very good. Although I understand that the day before yesterday. Well, I wanted to.

Regarding unnecessary modes and buttons - I agree

Since Stadler is so good, the absence of a multi-cook for my needs does not matter in your opinion?
Does Stadler only have one bowl option? - do not you need to bother or do you need to look for some specific one?

IF I choose FROM THREE - Stadler, Brand, Polaris 517, how would you arrange them in places (best, worse, outsider) in terms of my requirements?
Thank you

Although I understand that the day before yesterday. Well, I wanted to.

But the classic, the standard for comparison, so to speak

Since Stadler is so good, the absence of a multi-cook for my needs does not matter in your opinion?
Does Stadler only have one bowl option? - do not you need to bother or do you need to look for some specific one?

You will cook cottage cheese on heating. Casseroles work well with this model on baked goods. Quenching without question. There are specials for milk. mode (however, it happens that "mows"). Frying is slow, but you did not say anything about frying.
I already wrote to you twice about the bowl, that when buying, pay attention to the fact that the bowl is non-stick, and not "ceramic". Stadlers with a "ceramic" bowl have also entered the market. There is something like a green logo on the box.

IF I choose FROM THREE - Stadler, Brand, Polaris 517, how would you arrange them in places (best, worse, outsider) in terms of my requirements?

Such a rating is impossible. Each has advantages and disadvantages. Choose what you like best.

Thank you
Does Stadler cook porridge normally?

Does Stadler cook porridge normally?

What are you talking about: dairy or side dish? She cooks cereals for a side dish perfectly. Dairy too, but in some instances there are failures, since this touch mode:

There are specials for milk. mode (however, it happens that "mows").

Mann, but I couldn't do anything with myself, after Ozon messed up and gave me a 10% discount, 250 rubles and free shipping, I ordered a Panasonic SR-TMH18LTW for 1800. As a result, it cost 1500 rubles. Well, I like the pot in it and the swimmer from it is very good. Although I understand that the day before yesterday. Well I wanted

Yeah, mine is already very ancient, we love dearly. In addition to him, there are two more pieces, but they do not work as tasty as he cooks. Today in hyper I caught my eye for some absolutely wild money at 4600. I was completely worn out, too, at least buy it, if you get it again for a reasonable price. How will mine suddenly die? He's probably seven years old already. ((

What are you talking about: dairy or side dish? She cooks cereals for a side dish perfectly. Dairy too, but in some instances there are failures, since this touch mode:

Rice and buckwheat garnish (cereals) and oatmeal

[ame]

ame, Stadler perfectly cooks cereals for a side dish. He has several sensory modes - Rice in three softness options, Risotto (I often use it), Milk porridge (I cooked milk porridge for two in Stadler for a year, until I bought a 1.6 liter Redmond baby). I cook rice and buckwheat and millet for a side dish - excellent!

Thank you
Can oatmeal?

Can! On water or milk? Whole or flakes? I did everything.

Flakes
Mostly water but some milk added

Then it is important - the flakes should be free of powdery crumbs (this causes foam), clean, you can sift and rinse (I wash), grease the bowl in a circle at the top with oil (prevents it from running away). It is better to cook 1 multi glass per 1 liter of water / milk mixture. But this is a lot for me, I always cooked half of this portion, everything was fine.

Thank you)
Excuse me, but where do you store so many multicooker? Or are they all on your surface? And why are there so many?
A straightforward question - sincere (surprised)

[Manna]

Manna
A similar question, but I counted 7 multicooker and 3 bread makers. Is all this actively used? Is it possible to reduce such a large number of similarly functional devices?

Or is it like collecting?

[ame]

ame, I do not store them, but actively use them. 2 stand on the work surface, 2 on the stove, 1 on the shelf. An example of simultaneous use - in the morning in one porridge Dairy, the second - something meat (cutlets, beef - stroganoff, goulash, etc.), the third - a side dish, the fourth - a decoction of wild rose. And there will be few, multicooker in the sense. Especially when I go on a business trip and prepare a full set of breakfast-lunch-dinner for my husband for a week. They are all different! Who is the champion in baking, who is the side dish, who is the speed.

[Larssevsk]

Larssevsk, imagine, and I, like you, was tempted and bought Panasonic SR-TMH18LTW at OZONE! Now I rejoice in her

[ame]

ameA comparison that has already set the teeth on edge: this is just like ordinary pots in the kitchen, she is not the only one at the hostess, each is used for specific needs. For example, Stadler is an excellent multicooker, but frying is rather weak, and if you need to fry in a multicooker, then you get another multicooker with excellent frying ... and so on. Another reason is when you need to cook several dishes at once, for this you need several multicooker working simultaneously. I am not a supporter of collecting, I love a place in the kitchen. All equipment that is not used regularly is in the closet. More often than others, I now use Phillips 3060 and Redmond 01 because of the volume (I cook one portion several times a day).

why with such an abundance of an ordinary stove? or just a rudiment?

... a comparison that has already set the teeth on edge: this is just like ordinary pots in the kitchen, she's not the only one at the hostess, each is used for specific needs.

In answering a similar (typical) question, I use a comparison with gas and electric stoves: there is more than one burner in it ?!
And I also add, in addition to those listed by you, this is the argument: RELIABILITY, in the event of force majeure (one broke-burned-crashed) no one will be hungry!

I advise people to the ideal, in my opinion, option: the purchase of a decent multifunctional multicooker and a budget pressure cooker. Advice not from the ceiling, I took myself two pieces of iron according to the same principle: the Marta MT-1936 multicooker and the Polaris PPC 0105AD pressure cooker (now there are much better options!).

On the stove, if you noticed, I have a kettle. Still, you can boil water for tea using gas, saving energy. I also use boiling water in multicooker, speeding up the process. Pancakes and pancakes are also more expedient on the stove. Dumplings, boiling eggs. Almost everything else is done by multicooker. I’m so used to trusting them that I forget how to cook on the stove.

Hello everyone. Help with the choice of a multicooker-pressure cooker, from the forums you have read, your head is spinning, while the choice is between Moulinex 502 Redmond 140 and Polaris 124 and 0505, can you tell me something better, thanks in advance for your help!

Clear
Quite a hefty unit for boiling eggs and boiling water. Maybe it's time to completely eliminate it?
There will be a lot of space of type and there will be where to store spare multicooker)
Following the logic of Zogar, in case of F major, you need to have in stock, as mentioned earlier, "two, four, six, eight" kettles, coffee grinders, main cookers, microwave ovens, washing machines and everything else
But I’m not out of spite, I’m just jealous)

And baked goods. And in case of force majeure with a power outage. Our houses are supplied with gas, the gas cannot be cut off. Use it or not. And also brew coffee in a Turk. Or manti in a large mantle for guests (and not 6 things in a multicooker). But you never know there are cases when you need a stove. Why complicate your life by giving up some opportunities? It is the same with many things - to sit in the house there are chairs and stools and a sofa, we do not leave only a stool to save space. And the Internet - and a computer, and a tablet, and an iPhone.

Hello everyone. Help with the choice of a multicooker-pressure cooker, from the forums you have read, your head is spinning, while the choice is between Moulinex 502 Redmond 140 and Polaris 124 and 0505, can you tell me something better, thanks in advance for your help!

If we compare Moulinex and Polaris (they are similar), then the Moulinex is made more solidly (as those who "felt" both models say). Redmond ... for her very mixed reviews

If we compare Moulinex and Polaris (they are similar), then the Moulinex is made more solidly (as those who "felt" both models say). Redmond ... for her very mixed reviews

What is your manna?

What is your manna?

I am more on multicooker, I don’t like pressure cookers. If I had chosen from these three, I would have preferred mulinex.

[Technics]

... what is yours?

There is an active inscription under each participant's avatar "Technics", when you click on which you can see what kitchen appliances this forum member has.

[Technics]

There is an active inscription under each participant's avatar "Technics", when you click on which you can see what kitchen appliances this forum member has.

Thank you, I didn't know.

I am more on multicooker, I don’t like pressure cookers. If I had chosen from these three, I would have preferred mulinex.

Thank you, I will take your opinion into account.

[irina05021985]

irina05021985, I will express one more, opposite opinion. I just have a Redmond 110 pressure cooker. I use it every day - in the morning I cook meat dishes for lunch, in the afternoon I cook soups for the evening. There was not a single puncture! Everything is very simple and fast! I have had it for a year now, and I am still delighted. The bowl is one of the best. Fast and efficient frying. For example, pickle boiled in a pressure cooker. After dinner I poured it into a pot.

And these are ministerial chicken cutlets, again cooked in a pressure cooker.

[Anastasia]

pressure cooker Redmond 110

Anastasia, there it was about the 140th model. 110th already verified-rechecked

[Polaris PPMC 0124D]

... while the choice is between Moulinex 502 Redmond 140 and Polaris 124 and 0505, can you tell me something better ...

I would choose from your list Polaris PPMC 0124D - due to its great versatility: the device with the functions of cooking under pressure (pressure cooker) - 10 modes, and preset modes of cooking without pressure (multicooker) - 14 modes. In addition, there is a "Multi-cook" - 85 modes, including the "Yogurt" mode. The bowl is thick (3.5 mm) with bakelite handles and is dishwasher safe. There is a preliminary shutdown of heating.
At first the price was extremely overpriced, almost three times, and now it has dropped to quite acceptable. (from 5 590 rubles).

The second option could be REDMOND RMC-M110 - a proven device with a good reputation (in second place due to the lack of manual temperature setting).

And if not to be guided by your list, then I would choose myself according to the best price / functionality ratio. In this case, in my opinion and taste, the leader is Brand 6051... A lot of manual settings: pressure, temperature and time. In a multi-cooker step 5 ° С (temperature setting from 25 ° С to 130 ° С); the possibility of canceling the automatic heating at the end of the program.
And all this for little money (from 3,578 rubles)!

[Manna]

Manna, yes, I realized that the 140th. Just to the question of choosing between a multicooker and a pressure cooker, I mentioned that I also use a pressure cooker. And this is still very good.
irina05021985, do you only have the listed multicooker on sale? Indeed, 110 has already been tested by many, and the 140th is still undergoing a "run-in".

Brand 6051 leads

She has a bowl that is difficult to clean - "ceramics" with deep honeycomb.

Polaris PPMC 0124D - due to its great versatility

Functionally close to Mulinex 502832. Both under pressure and without pressure, and multi-cook, and "yogurt". Maybe a bowl without handles.

Quote: zogar from Today at 15:34 leads Brand 6051 She has a difficult-to-maintain bowl - "ceramic" with deep honeycomb.

A bowl from 18 Panasonic fits into Brand.

Functionally close to Moulinex 502832.

Yes, but in my choice I took into account a much larger number of users of the Polaris model, and, accordingly, recipes and tips.In addition, a slightly lower price and, for my taste, a more harmonious appearance predetermined a personal choice.

Hello everybody!
I was busy at work, I read from the phone only on notifications.
And I really wanted to say thank you for the clarification on the power!
Thank you

Hi everybody! With your help, I bought a cartoon, so I thought about the bread maker, but even if there is not enough equipment in the profile, send me to the right Temko, I’m lost, I want rye bread and every different oven, where can I find an overview of the best models?

[Oksana]

Oksana, bread makers in THIS section

[Manna]

Manna, thank you, and how I was looking that they didn’t appear on my list like that

Good night everybody! I'm new here!) Choose a slow cooker! It is very important that baked goods turn out well, as I really love baking! The stove is bad, and the airfryer dries from above, and everything inside is damp ((
Here I was puzzled by the purchase of a multi or multi / pressure cooker, so that all at once
I'm currently leaning towards redmond rmc-m90 or m140. Can you tell me how they bake? Or maybe give advice on some other company / model .. Thank you all in advance 🙏