Multicooker Panasonic SR-DY101WTQ

Goodnight! 2 hours ago I prepared dinner for my husband - buckwheat, and on top of it there were beef cutlets. It turned out super! On Kas mode. The mode is suitable for both milk and simple cereals (on water). I don’t know why you decided that this mode is only suitable for dairy products?

Girls, I also have 101 models, but the one without a display with 4 buttons. There is also a nerve regime for croup.
So I cook all the cereals for a side dish on Steam mode and that's it)
Even in my instructions, he writes that it is on Steam that rice, buckwheat, etc. should be cooked.
And if milk porridge or as I cook in water, then the Milk Porridge mode.

I don’t know why you decided that this mode is only suitable for dairy products?

you can cook on baking and stewing and on a steam and on the stove too, the question is in automatic mode.
And in the dairy time immediately shows, can it be changed? Or, as in pilaf, only the last 10 minutes?

So I cook everything on the side dish in Steam mode and that's it

OOO, for sure! There is steam, I forgot about it. It should be sensory, the principle is the same. Maximum boiling until complete evaporation of the liquid. For safety reasons, it should shut down when there is no water left. Will you try, girls?

That's right, as soon as the water boils away, the Steam mode is turned off, which is what is needed for cereals, rice)
But milk porridge works differently)

I thought about Par last night too. Here, I just cooked


1 glass of cereal for 1.5 water. The Steam program set 7 minutes (before the countdown begins, the steam is already running decently). Super cooked, better than Baking, no need to follow.

The mode is suitable for both milk and simple cereals (on water).

Natasha, we understood that yesterday. We are looking for a side dish to cook. It should be drier than dairy-free porridge and cook faster. The steam came up perfectly.

There is steam, I forgot about it. It should be sensory, the principle is the same.

Only in this Par is not sensory. But based on the experience of cooking, plus the experience of cooking in a cartoon, setting the right time is as easy as shelling pears. Rice, buckwheat for a side dish are cooked for about 15 minutes (plus or minus), Steam cooking starts 4-5 minutes before the ostchet, the program is already working intensively. And when it turns off, the fever lasts for a while. So these 15-18 minutes are obtained. I set 7 minutes, just right.

Super! What you need! What's the default time for a couple?
The sensor is the same protection it should be. The water has run out - it turns off so as not to burn out. Who dares to try?

Only in this Par is not sensory.

Yesterday my daughter asked for pasta. While I was taking off my make-up, the pasta was being prepared in the STEAMING mode, and I put the cutlets on top. I set the time to 13 minutes. Italian pasta, cooked on the stove even a little more than the stated 11 minutes. The countdown started from the moment the water boiled. And my daughter ran back and forth screaming for 7, 6, 5, 4 minutes (and we are learning to count), then after half a minute we heard a signal about the end of cooking. So I made a conclusion that this program is sensory. In short, the macaros were successful along with the cutlets

Here it is, the truth! Also, there is probably no water left at the bottom in the pasta? So you can set it at any time, it will stop anyway when the liquid boils away. Thank you!

No, why not! I myself was surprised when I saw that the program ended earlier. I opened it, and there the macaros lie without water! I like it! I am slowly mastering

Oh, how good, sorted out with cereals and pasta. What a smart cartoon we have

[Pronay]

Pronay, well, I'll torment you with questions. Excuse me. I looked, you have Redmond 01 and 02. I first considered these MBs for my mother, and also Stadler Form Chef One SFC.929 and Philips HD3134 / 00.You use both Panasonic and Redmond, you can compare. Still, Panasonic 10 will be better for the old lady? Thank you!

Old ladies are also different. Someone tells how their mothers and grandmothers (and fathers and grandfathers) easily cope with technology, someone not very well. My mother is 67, a pretty "advanced" lady, but she is somehow afraid of the cartoon. Why am I for Panasik 10 - the simplest. 3 touch modes: throw and rest. The power is small, very delicate cooking, the pan is good and there are spare ones. If your mom forgets about the cartoon for a couple of hours, no one will get hurt (neither mom, nor pot). Redmonds without sensors. You will have to set the time yourself, for this you need to have some experience with cartoons. There are no spare pans for 02. There are spare pans for 01, I read many complain about the coating with intensive use. 01 very delicate, good cereals, baby food very good mode, very long baking, good soups, super yogurt. 02 is much smarter, I personally run porridge, some do not ..., the pastries are good. Multi is not bad. But personally, I missed the Pilaf mode in them, a sensory one, on which everything in the world turns out so cool: meat with vegetables, fish with vegetables, just vegetables, actually pilaf itself. The baking mode is very successful. I don't bake anything except cottage cheese casserole, but the vegetables there turn out to be incomparable, fish, chicken mmm-mm. On the Milk porridge mode, not only cook porridge, but potatoes in sour cream sauce with cheese, chicken in creamy sauce, liver in sour cream. Stewing, although slow, does not boil the vegetables into pieces. Here it is just like a classic: "Now, if only to the nose of Ivan Ivanovich, but to put the ears of Pyotr Ilyich" .. etc. In short, after giving my mother Panas-10, having bought myself Redmond 01 and 02, I really miss Panasik. .. (as in that joke: "And I go out again to Deribasovskaya"). And right now, my 01 and 02 are still idle. Kuku and Panasik are working. In principle, they were bought to help Cook, but the good old Panas returned again. The truth is a little different. I can't say anything about Stadler Form Chef One SFC.929 and Philips HD3134 / 00, I'm sorry.

Some observations, maybe someone will come in handy, who else is thinking of buying or not. The multicooker is very nimble. Sometimes I even want to call it a multicooker pressure cooker. Cooks side dishes faster than the Cuckoo. 2 times already managed to burn a little fry for the soup, a little porridge from 0.5 ms of cereal was fried. The stewing is very intense, steaming starts almost immediately after the program is set. I wanted to bake one stuffed chicken breast, as before, in 10-ke, I was afraid that it would just be elementary fried, and not like baked in the old model. I put it on Steam in a steam basket in foil, and instead of 25 minutes. it was ready already in about 16. In my opinion, the cartoon should be loaded with products in full. If you cook in small portions, for one, two and one meal all will burn to hell will be very boiled. On Stew, it is good to fill a full saucepan with cabbage rolls, peppers, a lot of meat (with potatoes, for example), cook a decent amount of soup, stew well. A small amount, for example, vegetables such as zucchini, etc., in an hour (by default) will boil down into porridge (or follow without leaving). Baking, unlike 10-ki powerful, should be baked in one cycle. Still, the power of 790 watts for 3 liters is decent. I’m not saying if it’s bad or good, but the cartoon is a beast! Peregrine Falcon! There is nothing in common with old Panasik. Wrote something. I apologize if it seems messy.

[Pronay]

Pronay, do you have 10 Panasonic and 101? I'm choosing between them now. I want just Panasonic, they are very attracted by the reviews about them. But 5 liters, as in 181 new, is a lot for me. Please advise which of these two to take? In the topic on choosing a multicooker, I was told that the 10th cooks porridge for 2 hours. Is 101 faster?

[valjushka]

valjushka, yes, I have 10 and 101. They both cook porridge for exactly 1 hour. Time doesn't change. It is rather difficult to advise which one to take. If you fill a large volume of a saucepan with food, then probably 101, she cooks well, smartly. If there are not very many products, it is necessary to monitor it, because, again, it is very nimble, it can spoil it.And in 10-ke, a small volume will never spoil, it cooks very delicately. According to the modes, they are configured the same: Porridge - 1 hour both there and there; Pilaf is also 1 hour in both. There is no separate program for side dishes in 101, I cook on the Steam program. Excellent, in 15 minutes 1.5 cups of cereals are ready. I love both of them very much, they are different, but now I would still choose 101, the speed of cooking captivates. Although to give credit, she cooks well too.

And I join the question. I just want to buy one for the pier. porridge. In terms of functionality, it does not seem to differ from its predecessor, but the power still made its own adjustments. Which one do you think is the best way to cook milk?

[Vika]

Vika, I cooked 101 2 times long-boiled oatmeal, with a volume of 1 MCT of cereal for 4 milk, both times fried, although the porridge is delicious. I don't cook porridge in it anymore. But for the sake of the purity of the experiment, I'll try to cook rice today, I'll write later.

[Tatyana]

Tatyana, I will be very grateful.

I just put it to cook (the most interesting, and still planned to cook in the evening). I'll unsubscribe in an hour. 1 mst of rice for 2.5 milk and 1.5 water, sugar, salt, oil. Only I apologize, I can't take a picture (the tablet was temporarily "expropriated")

Now I'm cooking porridge in bags, it seems there are 100 grams each - is this amount not enough for 101? Have you tried baking on it? (I often cook cottage cheese casserole)

[Valentine]

Valentine, and how much liquid do you have per 100 grams of cereal? And what cereal? I use baked goods in it for vegetables, fish, chicken. I make a cottage cheese casserole from 1 pack of cottage cheese in another cartoon. But 101 can handle casserole without any problems. Her baking program is well tuned, powerful, intelligent, smooth, you just need to choose the right time. I just don't bake anything (due to nutritional restrictions), and it makes no sense to use it for one pack of cottage cheese.

I am reporting. Porridge from 1 mst of rice and 2.5 milk 1.5 water - super. At the bottom, in one place, the size of a 2-ruble shifter is an easy frying. Everything else is good. The rice is well boiled, the milk is absorbed. Not thick, not liquid. But next. since I will do 1 to 5 (cereal to liquid), I like this more. And if there is more cereal and liquid, it seems to me it will not fry. (Very sorry, very sorry that without the pictures). And most importantly, no attempts to escape, although a decent steam was pouring down.

[Tanya]

Thanks a LOT for the test, Tanya! Oh, how did you please me!

Well, wow, how nimble, she even fries milk. Unexpectedly for a Panasonic
Interestingly, if you cook only in milk, will it run?

[Tanya]

Oh, I forgot to ask. Tanyawhat size of the saucepan: diameter, height.

even fries milk

Manna, but this is still a thick proportion for milk porridge. And in a ratio of 1: 5 this may not be.

I also need a casserole from one pack of cottage cheese. About cereals in bags - I cook this in a saucepan on the stove. I meant whether it was possible to cook such a quantity in 101 or it was not enough for her. And how many servings of rice porridge did you get from 1 MCT?

[Vika]

Interestingly, if you cook only in milk, will it run?

I cooked the first 2 times only in milk, the first even from 0.5 mst of hercules. There were traces of foam bubbles on the lid, but there were no traces of escape, although steam was pouring. She sat next to the cartoon and could hardly restrain herself not to open it.

Well, wow how nimble

Here I am about it. I say: something between a pressure cooker and a multicooker (well, figuratively). But one thing I can say for sure - for all the nimbleness, the algorithm of operation of the modes, characteristic of Panas, is preserved.

what size of the saucepan: diameter, height.

Vika, the diameter of the pan at the bottom is 18 cm, the height is 11 cm.

[Valentine]

is it possible to cook this in 101 or is it not enough for her. And how many servings of rice porridge did you get from 1 MCT?

Valentine, if half a multi-glass is 80 grams, then I think you can, but it can slightly fry. From 1 MCT, 3 portions were not small. If there is 5 mst of liquid, then from 1 tbsp you get a small fourth.

Yes, I also forgot to say, my husband, who has eaten only multi-cooked porridge for the last 4 years, having eaten porridge out of 101, to my surprise, repeated 3 times what a delicious porridge, although he has no idea in which cartoon, and what I cook. Having tasted rice today, I was also pleasantly surprised. I personally liked the porridge from the LL pressure cooker, they are very similar to those that my grandmother cooked for me as a child (and her process was complicated, in the oven in a cauldron, then 5-6 hours under the pillow, such dances with a tambourine wow ! but it was worth it). So just like grandma's.
In general, I like the cartoon more and more. Speed mad good, Panasik's algorithm. But the portions need to be larger, or follow. The main thing is to adapt.

[Vika]

Which one do you think is the best way to cook milk?

Vika, sorry, did not see the question. If at least 1 tbsp, then 101 will cook well (slightly fry). If less, the bottom will fry more. (Not much, but noticeably). The duration is an hour in both cartoons, unchanged. But it seems to me that if exclusively for cereals, then 10 is the best, but this is IMHO ...

[Tatyana]

Tatyana, please try to cook porridge in milk 1: 5. I'd like to know the result

[Manna]

Manna, can you tomorrow? okay? Otherwise, I have no milk left, and tomorrow (or later in the evening) I will buy it and how will I get it ...
And what kind of milk are you interested in in terms of fat content? I just always buy 1.5 - 2.5 percent. Maybe take fatter?

[Tatyana]

Tatyana, the usual percentage of fat content of milk is 3.2, 1.5-2.5% - this is already skimmed. If you usually take 2.5%, then cook with this milk (why buy something else specially - to eat the same porridge for you)

the usual percentage of milk fat is 3.2,

I am aware of this. I just thought maybe "shoots" are somehow connected with fat content. For the sake science the purity of the experiment I can take fatter ...

Of course, they are connected: the fatter, the greater the likelihood of escape. If you accept a porridge with milk of 3.2%, then you can cook on it

: scout: The task is clear, boom to act!

[Pronay]

Pronay, thank you very much for describing how the multicooker works! Today I bought this (101), now I cook water with a lemon

[Valentine]

Valentine, Congratulations !!! I hope it will only please !!! I wish you success and pleasant communication with your assistant !!

[Tanya]

Tanya, I will also torment you with questions. I look in the description of the configuration Depth adjustable steamer container - what is it?

Thank you! Steamed potatoes - much tastier than in a philips steamer! Tomorrow I will cook porridge

[Vika]

Tanya, I will torment you with questions.

Vika, do not worry, everything is fine! The steamer is NOT adjustable, this is not an accuracy in the description. There she is

Cooked porridge !!!! SUPER!!!

Oddly enough, there was very little steam in the process (when the milk was less fat and there was less steam, it was very strong). Not a single attempt to escape was even conceived, the milk did not stir, the butter melted exactly where it was at the beginning of cooking. I'm in a good, pleasant shock! Panasik is on top !!!!

Steamed potatoes - much tastier than in a double boiler

Valya, with your first successful experiment! Porridge will not disappoint you either! I got it super! Only she needs to stand a little, thicken, in principle, it is everywhere, if you cook 1 to 5.

[Tanya]

Vika, don't worry, everything is fine!

Thank you, Tanya! And come on, if you don't mind.
Porridge -. More and more I want this MV!

Thank you, Tanya! And come on, if you don't mind.

With pleasure!

More and more I want this MV!

And I like it more and more !!

[Manna]

: girl-lol: Now I went to stir the porridge (she insisted - delight!), my husband passed by and could not resist, tried a spoon, said: “Amazing! Some kind of porridge like never before! Although I started to cook from skim milk recently, before, all the time from 3.2. (And sometimes from 6 percent). I asked: "Weren't porridge like that before?" He said that this one is very tasty, what it tastes better, but tastier. I’m thinking now .. And it seems he is not hungry (the dinner was hearty). Well, she looks good.The structure is homogeneous, no flakes, it was cooked to the desired consistency, it did not stand a lot and it became the tsimus itself. In general, THANKS Mannathat she asked to cook porridge !!!

[Tanechka]

TanechkaThank you very much for the experiment with porridge. So, I didn't run anywhere, SUPER !!! And there were no burns at the bottom?

Still interesting ... since it is nimble, it would be nice to check the stewing, is it boiling strongly, or are the temperatures observed there?