Juicer (selection, discussion, reviews)

Wow! And they didn't have anything even more exotic? no need to listen to local would-be consultants who sell what is beneficial to them.

Strawberries I have such a harvester lepse Gamma 7-1 only without a coffee grinder since 2002. It plows only this way, I really like it.

A belated answer. I bought the combine three months ago. and tried the juicer. I like the harvester, I used the juicer once or twice. Not bad, but I want a juicer separately. I'll buy another, probably Panasonic. The store recommended this one: Redmond RJ-M902 / M901

I have a Panasonic MJ-W171P - a good choice if you need to make a little juice sometimes or once or twice a day. True, the blender in it (for me) is clearly superfluous, it is gathering dust somewhere in the closet. Perhaps there are modifications of this model without a blender.

For mass harvesting, for example, if you have your own garden and a lot of fruits, you probably need to take something more powerful.

I have a Panasonic MJ-W171P - a good choice if you need to make a little juice sometimes or once or twice a day. True, the blender in it (for me) is clearly superfluous, it is gathering dust somewhere in the closet. Perhaps there are modifications of this model without a blender.

But my blender from this juicer is used more often than she herself - there is a one-year-old child in the house, a granddaughter :-)

Shl. There are no modifications to this model without a blender. But there is also a modification with a coffee grinder, MJ-W176P ...

Girls, does anyone have a Bork juicer? I want a good juicer within 20,000 rubles, but I can't decide. Who will say what?

I have Bork for the second year. She is very pleased with her - she squeezes out almost dry, quickly and easily washed it with a special brush. The container for pressing is roomy - you can process a lot of fruits and vegetables at once. I also like how her glass for collecting juice is arranged. There is a foam cutter - a handy piece of equipment. Well, about the spin speed - "Zipper and you're done." The only drawback is the price.

About a month ago I bought Bork. It presses well and quickly. Easy to clean. The glass is really comfortable. Issue price 8000.

Followed this thread since last year. on the advice of members of the forum looked at Panasonic and Philips. Panasonic's design did not make an impression on me "live", somehow it looks old-fashioned (sorry, having such an assistant!) I decided to take Phillips, I read a lot of good words about him both here and on other sites
As a result of my research, I bought Phillips 1861 for 5.5 thousand in Eldorado. You could take 1858, exactly the same characteristics. 1.5 thousand cheaper, but in a plastic case. But, since they gave me money for this thing, I decided not to deny myself
What can I say? I have been using it since spring. The first thing that struck me was very quiet. HIGHLY. Well, he just squeezes in a whisper! The second is extremely easy to disassemble, only 3 parts, you don't need to combine anything with anything, it just won't fit in another way, just the way it should. Everything can be washed in a dishwasher, but a useful brush for washing the mesh is included. As well as a jug with a defoamer.
Oilcake of varying degrees of moisture with different vegetables and fruits. But I cannot say that it is "wet". Sometimes there is really a lot of foam, then I put in the pennatter, because the long standing will harm the juice.
All spring I drank a mixture: 2 apples, 2 oranges, 2 carrots. Very tasty, refreshing, quenches thirst ... And, you know, I spent the first spring without multivitamins and spring blues and weakness.
This year, in Michurin's homeland, the apple harvest is such that a banana box on the market costs a maximum of 100 rubles. I cann’t preserve anything, I drink fresh.Because in the winter the same box will cost 300 rubles and I will drink fresh Carrot juice on the market 50 rubles a bucket. Well, I'll go broke for oranges ... Now children are happy to drink apple + grapes. Big harvest at grandfather and. again, in the bazaar. So fresh juices are very affordable. Drink every day with the whole family.
P.S. We go to the supermarket. To my son and daughter in front, I say: "Will you take a pack of multifruit My Family for you?" (Their favorite was!) They both turn and answer in chorus: "AHA! You can also buy a loaf of bread and feast like that!" (We haven't bought bread at all for almost 2 years!) In general, after drinking natural juice for a short time. you begin to understand WHAT is packed in bags with inviting inscriptions.

... Panasonic's design "live" did not make an impression on me, somehow it looks old-fashioned (sorry, having such an assistant!) ...

Of course, the taste and the color ...

And I, on the contrary, do not like modern "careful - modern" at all, my kitchen is very far from futuristic motives, and most modern juicers like a small orbital-space moonshine still do not roll. This is also why he took Panasonic, - for the undying classics of form, which for several decades has been quietly experiencing another modern postmodernism of the coming and going models of competitors ...

Girls, does anyone have a Bork juicer? I want a good juicer within 20,000 rubles, but I can't decide. Who will say what?

It cost them about 8,000 rubles + a blender as a gift (it seems there was a promotion).
Until I saw her alive, I criticized her, because I read a lot about the "German Bork technique".

It turned out that "not all yoghurts are equally useful" (c).

Pros:
1.several speeds each for squeezing its own fruit-vegetable)
2.Reliable shredder design (minimum plastics)
3.Quiet and powerful motor with good alignment
4.Good diameter socket (less knife work)
5.The performance is closer to professional technology
6.looks monumental and reliable (probably designed by Sobakevich)

Minuses:
1.the price is not democratic
2.Assembly after washing sometimes requires referring to the book

But 1 liter of celery-cucumber juice in 3 minutes (carrot juice without foam with cream) is something!

Yesterday I bought Panasonic 176. I'm very happy. From two apples, a glass of juice. Dry extracts. You can also throw stubs. From everything shakes. Before that I bought Scarlett. Not only was it defective, the lever did not squeeze the lid, but still squeezed the juice, from 6 apples - a glass. the squeezes are wet, straight mashed potatoes, they ate it with a spoon, because it was a pity to throw it away.
As a result, I took it back, returned the money. And, remembering that I am a fan of Panasonic technology (bread maker and multicooker), I chose this brand. I am very satisfied. The set includes a blender and a coffee grinder. Everything is very good. While working. Takes up little space. Washes quickly.

Hello everyone! About 7-8 years ago I bought a Saturn juicer (later it turned out that this is a complete analogue of Brown, only at my 2nd speed and it was made, it seems, in the Czech Republic, and the price is 2 times less). I chose it according to the principle - there must be a small gap between the grater and the body so that solid waste is minimal (before buying I saw a Toshiba juicer from a neighbor, so she had this gap of almost 1 cm). Mine has less than 5 mm. A glass for collecting juice with a defoamer, a double container for the cake, so that juice still flows out of the soft cake. For the first time, I made cutlets from carrot cake, but very soon I realized that it was a useless product, since the cake was not just dry, but very dry. With apples, the picture is different - it all depends on the variety. In short, the harder, the drier the cake. But the soft cake goes like mashed potatoes (you just need to peel and remove the core of the apples). Minus - small receiver for fruit and bad shape (crescent).
But now I've seen enough and read about Panasonic and "bad" thoughts about changing the device appeared. I just want to watch it from all sides without leaving the house. Maybe someone will take pity and post a photo of this juicer from the place where the cake falls.

I read it, as always, I was completely confused and I want to ask for help.
You need a juicer, no blender, etc. In order for parents to squeeze out a couple of glasses of juice a day. Easier to use, more reliable. It is not the price that matters, but the fact that they would be simple and convenient to use. Tell me something?

I read it, as always, I was completely confused and I want to ask for help.
You need a juicer, no blender, etc. In order for parents to squeeze out a couple of glasses of juice a day. Easier to use, more reliable. It is not the price that matters, but the fact that they would be simple and convenient to use. Tell me something?

Take Panasonic. Well, yes, he has a blender in the kit. The only drawback for someone. I myself have now got 3 blenders at home - from a juicer and from two combines. Well, what to do - give up good things just because there is also this glass in the kit? But the price-quality, as well as the convenience and ease of use, it is unsurpassed - this is not at all embarrassed to say even after the time of use. And I can cite other people's reviews for several years.

Anastasia, thanks !!!! I'll think. Again, you will have to mutuz online stores .... Is it not very big?

Anastasia, thanks !!!! I'll think. Again, you will have to mutuz online stores .... Is it not very big?

No, not a very big, smaller Panasonic bread machine and less than any modern monsters, and for storage the shape is not round, as usual, but such a rectangular one is very convenient!
26x18x32 cm (length x width x height)

[Anastasia]

Anastasia, Thank you! "Will seek!" : D as Semyon Semyonitch said.

[Anastasia]

Anastasia, Thank you! "Will seek!" : D as Semyon Semyonitch said.

To your health! Happy shopping!

[artisan]

artisanabout a small citrus squeezer. There are plenty of them in any hardware store. They cost about 1000 on average, a little more, a little less. I have Phillips. Just such a squat wide glass with a citrus attachment on top. Cut an orange (grapefruit, lemon) in half, lean against this attachment and in a minute you have a dry peel of half an orange. all the juice flows into the glass through the slots wide for the passage of juice and pulp, but narrow for the seeds to get there. It washes instantly, because everything is quickly removed, disassembled, assembled (I would say it is invested). and the glass also has a spout through which it is very convenient to pour juice into glasses. It takes up space like a liter saucepan. It has been working properly for three years, despite the frenzied load in the autumn-winter-spring season, when the price of oranges ranges from 40 to 60 rubles and you can buy them in heaps. For a glass of juice, about 200g, I take one and a half, sometimes two oranges. I have already got used to choosing them, which are more juicy. I cannot explain, because these are my feelings, the main thing is that they are not thick-skinned and not with a pale skin color. That's what I wrote ... I hardly understand myself.
All.

[Eleanor]

Eleanor, Thank you. But I realized that a small juicer is suitable for everything .... I'm still looking for a universal one.

Oh, it's not an easy job .... buying a juicer!

I’ve already tuned in to Panasonic, I praise my dad (as the main sponsor), but it turns out that he wants a juicer with a shredder !!!!!!!!! Except Zhuravinka and SADOVAYA SVSHPP - 302 (with a shredder) I don't see anything .... But they wrote something not very good about Zhuravinka .... People !!!! Help !!!!

I gave Zhuravinka a gift to my friend since she needed a juicer for giving, for a large volume of apples, you can't imagine how happy she was, because she suffered with an expensive imported juicer that can squeeze juice continuously for no more than 5 minutes ., and Zhuravinka 1.5 hours, of course she may not look very efficient, but she is.

Today I ordered Panasonic MJ-176PR, delivery on Tuesday. I understand that this one is good for a small amount of juice, but for Zhuravinka's dacha.

Today I ordered Panasonic MJ-176PR, delivery on Tuesday. I understand that this one is good for a small amount of juice, but for Zhuravinka's dacha.

I agree absolutely! Only Panasonic is not due to the fact that the low-power one is suitable for a small amount of juice, but due to the fact that he throws the cake under his own lid on the side and a lot of cake does not fit there just physically, but during storage you do not need to think where stick in a container for collecting cake - everything is very compact and neat.
But about the number of processed, I read a review like this: "The juicer passed the" battle "baptism - missed 4 bags of apples On average, 4 liters of juice are obtained from one bucket (6 kg). The problem with overheating is solved simply - the bunker is filled approximately after squeezing 1 liter juice and while you slowly clean out the cake, the machine cools down. For 2 hours of squeezing, it never stopped from overheating. At first it was inconvenient to clean the bunker so often, and then I got used to it. And yet the purpose of this juicer is to get a couple of glasses of juice , and not a large-scale harvesting of juice. Although it copes with this task quite quickly and, most importantly, high quality. "

Thank you girls. Once again I conducted explanatory work with my dad. He insists on a juicer with a shredder. I think he's right. Mom, if she makes friends with her, there will be one more assistant. If I chose for myself, then of course it would be a Panasonic combine and juicer instead of a shredder. Well, yes, not cheap, but you can dream ...
I found a friend with Zhuravinka. I'll go take a look and listen.

Anastasia, the decisive factors for buying Panasonic were:
- dry cake
- pr-l Japan
I once had juices., After which I had to squeeze the cake through cheesecloth.

Anastasia, the decisive factors for buying Panasonic were:
- dry cake
- pr-l Japan
I once had juices. After which I had to squeeze the cake through cheesecloth.

I think that you will be happy with your current choice! When you try it, be sure to share your impressions! Happy shopping!

Yes, I will definitely share my impression! And the apples are waiting in the hall.

Hello! And does anyone know why the price of Panasonic-176 in Internet stores is less than that of 171, although there is also a coffee grinder in the 176 model?

Hello! Does anyone know why the price of Panasonic-176 in Internet stores is less than that of 171, although there is also a coffee grinder in the 176 model?

I do not know why. When I bought myself and my mother almost 2 years ago, it was all the other way around, I bought 171 for myself, it was cheaper, and for my mother, 176, she was a little more expensive. The only difference is this grinder. There are no other differences. Therefore, if you are thinking of taking, then take whichever of these models is more necessary.

Anastasia, thank you. Just today I'm thinking of ordering (after reading your and other members of the forum reviews). I wonder what ...

Well, if there is no small mill at home, and sometimes you want to grind nuts or powdered sugar from sand or something else, not even coffee, then you can take it with a coffee grinder - it is small, it won't take much space.

Brought today Panasonic (with a coffee grinder). We tried to squeeze apples and pumpkin. I liked the juice. The cake cannot say that it is dry, but rather like plasticine.
After the 1st test, questions arose to the owners of a similar model. Tell me, it's okay that:
1. some of the cake is collected under the container lid and around the centrifuge;
2. Are apple pieces found in the cake?

Brought today Panasonic (with a coffee grinder). We tried to squeeze apples and pumpkin. I liked the juice. The cake cannot say that it is dry, but rather like plasticine.
After the 1st test, questions arose to the owners of a similar model. Tell me, it's okay that:
1. some of the cake is collected under the container lid and around the centrifuge;
2. Are apple pieces found in the cake?

1. there is such, but this is not critical - the next batch of cake pushes the previous one anyway, in the end, to the right place.
2. But there is no such thing and there never was, there should not be any pieces in principle!
At what speed was the juice pressed?

Today there was a delivery of Panasonic 176. Alas, there is no instruction in Russian. Tomorrow they will call, but now I want to drink some juice.
As I understand it, 1 and 2 speeds are for juice, and pulse mode is for a blender. Right? Pliz, tell me. And what for a mill?

Anastasia, wringing at 2nd speed.
Strawberries, I also do not have instructions in Russian. I downloaded it on the Internet.

It is strange that there is no instruction in Russian. I had — as well as a multicooker — in two-Russian and Ukrainian languages.

I am confused by something else in this situation - if there is no instruction in Russian, is it generally an official delivery, not a gray case?

I am confused by something else in this situation - if there is no instruction in Russian, is it generally an official delivery, not a gray case?

So it confused me. Today they should have called, they did not call. (((

I liked the juicer, class! (although there is no instruction in Russian.) Now I made apple juice at the second speed, yesterday I did it at 1 and 2. Maybe that's why there was a lot of foam, now there is less. The cake is almost dry, its only in the trash can. I'll post the photo later.

I wanted to post a photo of the juice, but it didn't work out. I didn't understand how. ((((

That's it, sweet strawberry
https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&Itemid=99999999&topic=3539.0

And how I forgot about the Radical photo. THANK YOU!

You can familiarize yourself with the range of juicers and purchase them at a wholesale price here: https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&Itemid=26&topic=9114.0

tell me, has anyone squeezed juice from a pomegranate in a mechanical citrus juicer, does it squeeze normally or not?

I have Brown for four years now - small, compact, crushes fruits and vegetables well.

I also have this for several years. A similar but newer model.
I'm glad. But nothing can be done from waste (cake).
This is already a completely fresh mass, like sawdust.
And the juice is excellent. We use it constantly.
Squeezing citrus fruits on it is not very good. well.

Today, after a long choice, we bought a Panasonic MJ-W171PWTQ juicer. We were very pleased with the choice - it squeezes out juice well (for example, I got 200ml of juice from 2 apples weighing 250g), the cake is quite dry, it is very easy to disassemble and wash - only three parts need to be washed - the lid, the mesh and the part where the mesh is attached (according to part-time the same part is a cake receiver).
p / s / There was a doubt whether this juicer would crush juice from oranges. Today I bought oranges and tried to pass it through the apparatus, the experience went with a bang. Medium orange, half a large cup of juice. So you don't have to buy a dedicated citrus juicer.

I have the same. Superb! Squeezes juice out of everything, even grass (tested).

In Panasonic they squeezed out celandine juice - about 200 grams of juice was squeezed out of a package of herbs (for a 3kg package).

[Bork]

There is also a question about buying.
The choice is between Bork, Bosch and Panasonic MJ-W171PWTQ (reviews on the forum are impressive).

One thing is not clear, the power is the smallest in Panasonic - 230 W, while those - 700 and 950 W.
Doesn't power play a role?
Judging by the reviews, only Panasonic is in the lead

Judging by the reviews, only Panasonic is in the lead

Yeah, just him. Previously, there were two of them (Panasonic and Bosch), since then, when Bosch began to be produced in Slavin ...

[* kisena]

* kisena , when I was once puzzled by the choice of a juicer - I shoveled a lot of information on the internet. So - power is not the main thing, the main thing is the number of revolutions of the centrifuge, I think (or whatever it is called there).
As a result of studying numerous tests of juicers, I chose 2 models: Panasonic and Braun MP80.
I bought myself a Panas (bribed the name of the brand), I am satisfied with everything, BUT, if I would buy this device again for myself, I would buy Brown, because 1. for 1-2 glasses of juice - Brown is enough for the eyes, and Panas is raw can be served in buckets
2.brown is more compact, takes up less space and in terms of ease of use it was higher in the test than Panasonic.
3. Brown is almost 2 times cheaper.
4. Panas squeezes out a very clear juice, without foam, and Brown has a little pulp (this was also in the test results) - this juice is certainly more useful.
5. In Panas there is a blender included - cool! with a glass bowl. But I got 3 of them in total. If you don't have a blender, then this item will be a plus for you.

I in no way detract from the merits of Panasonic, this is just my point of view, of course, you choose

And I have a question about juicers: on which one can you put whole apples with seeds and drive the juice continuously? We have a garden Michurinskaya 301 for 52 liters per hour, but we need to cut the apples and remove the seeds, imported ones are usually designed for a small batch of apples, and not for our volumes.