Choosing a multicooker, pressure cooker, rice cooker (2)

But apparently no one here has such

I wait from day to day, should have come a long time ago.

[Yuri]

Ooooh! So we need to open a topic about her!
Yuri, open a topic about this model?

open a topic about this model

Easy.
There she is:
https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&topic=426981.new#new

Easy.

Then please throw the link here, so as not to search.

Thanks for your attention and answers.

I'm for the last Filia. I really like it. There is no such dish yet where he would screw up. (TTT)

That is, PHILIPS HD 3058?

A multi-cook is usually required where the main programs are "mismatched". It is possible to "steer the cooking time" without a multi-cook, in the main modes.

Steer the time, yes, but not the temperature. Sometimes you need to lower the temperature, or vice versa - heat it up. Although of course you are right - for the most part 3-4 modes are enough.

As for the Phillips, it's best to look at 3158.

I looked at this model, but did not include it in the list - alas, it is not available outside of Russia and Belarus :(

The agony of choice continues

HILIPS HD 3058?

I think Rita is talking about 3197.

Sometimes you need to lower the temperature, or vice versa - heat it up. Although of course you are right - for the most part 3-4 modes are enough.

To do this, you can select the mode corresponding to the required temperature.

If active frying is not a matter of principle, then Stadler meets your requirements. With active hot Phillips. 3165 is functionally similar to 3158 (the difference in design and volume), so you can look in its direction.

[Sens]

Sens, by the will of fate I got two La Cuchinki. They are still plowing perfectly, despite the fact that both were flooded: one. - jam, the second - porridge and more than once. In terms of functionality, they are simply irreplaceable to me in the country. Of course, I updated the bowls for them. I don't want to part with them.

I think Rita is talking about 3197.

This model is obviously new - it is not on sale yet. But I liked it very much. Something like Stadler.

If active frying is not a matter of principle, then Stadler meets your requirements.

More and more I am inclined to Stadler. Frying \ sautéing - in your favorite frying pan. Somehow I don't want to fry in MV - I feel sorry for her, and then wash it

Now we need to decide on the volume. There was an idea to take one main MV per 3 liters, and then a five-liter trailer to it, maybe even a simpler model - for example, if you need to make stuffed peppers, since good-sized peppers in two floors do not fit into a five-liter bottle. At the same time, you can screw up more cabbage rolls.

Or well, nafig him and restrict himself to one five-liter bottle again and not fool your head?

What does your experience suggest?

Or well, nafig him and restrict himself to one five-liter bottle again and not fool your head? What does your experience suggest?

My experience suggests that for a family of two, three multicooker is indispensable.

[Galina]

Galina, PPKS!
2 multicooker work "tirelessly" and sometimes they are not enough, I am planning a third multicooker-pressure cooker.

[Vika]

Vika, I constantly plow all three.

It is quite possible to do with two multicooker, but if at the same time there is still where to cook (stove, other appliances such as electric pans, grills, etc.)

Mannochka, I need three multicooker with all the additional appliances and an excellent stationary stove.

[Mirabel]

Girls, no matter how many multi-cookers work at once, you still need to have an additional bowl for each.
Mirabel, a pressure cooker will come in very handy with two cartoons.

[Sveta]

Sveta,

no matter how many multi-cookers work right away, you still need to have an additional bowl for each

I rarely use add. bowls. I have them only in two multicooker: Philips (non-stick to ceramic) and Cromax (both non-stick: in one I boil fish, and in the other I pour broth - I use this multicooker now only for fish soup). I mean, not everyone and not always need extra. bowls.

that not everyone and not always need extra. bowls.

It depends on the composition of the eaters, their preferences and diets.

My experience suggests that a family of two cannot do without three multicooker.

Kapets, are you there, eating 25 hours a day?

[gala10]

My experience suggests that for a family of two, three multicooker is indispensable.

gala10, Galina, it's probably if only to cook in cartoons? We have three in our family, plus endless guests, but one multicooker is more than enough for me, if I take something else, then only a pressure cooker, and so ... there is also a bunch of kitchen units for cooking

The discussion goes around this circle again). How many slow cookers do you need to be happy? ... It's not the same for everybody. I have at least three. Here's an example. In the morning I have to prepare breakfast and lunch for my husband for work. In one slow cooker in the evening there is porridge, in the morning I threw chicken parts into another, in the third - a side dish. So all three are busy. And then in the morning I'll throw a cake at the Princess (bread is needed for dinner).

[Anastasia]

Anastasia, so the fact of the matter is that everything is individual ... probably, you should not categorically declare that you need so many multicooker.
Everyone has different eating habits and rhythm of life. In my family, for example, breakfast is most often oatmeal, scrambled eggs or pastries - that is, in the morning you don't need a cartoon, you don't need to cook lunch, a side dish for dinner is prepared in a slow cooker, meat or fish in the oven. We take those for which a multicooker is not needed - pancakes, salads, chops, etc.
So for me this multicooker is most often to cook a side dish or bake a biscuit, and I do not see the need for a second, third or fourth multicooker, besides, I love my Stadler with quivering love, and I admit that someone may not even have five multicooker for a complete happiness

Kapets, do you eat there for 25 hours a day?

We do not eat, but culturally use. I have 3 multicooker at the same time that never work, but for each dish it has its own - the one that cooks it tastier. For everything sweet-vanilla and porridge, a separate small (so that these dishes do not smell of garlic), a pressure cooker for cereal soups and meat, for side dishes, a swimmer and vegetable dishes (including vegetable soups), a slow cooker. They stand in a row on the windowsill.

Oh ladies
I only have one, but it works for three
From time to time I will roll over to buy a second one, but I still can't choose.

I have 3 multicooker at the same time that never work, but for each dish it has its own - the one that cooks it tastier.

Vooot !!!

Kapets, do you eat there for 25 hours a day?

Ffffuuu, how rude ...

Girls, I'm the only one so picky that all dishes with one multi are delicious to me

[V-tina]

V-tina, so I wrote about myself - how anyone. I don't care how many devices someone has, it just hurts when they categorically declare, they say, were stunned to buy more than one multicooker? I don’t scream anywhere, oh, how do you live without a multicooker? Or why just one?
I am comfortable with a few who cope somehow differently, to their health!

[Tina]

Tina, when I had only one cartoon, everything from it was delicious to me too, and now I figured out where which tastes better. And oatmeal (and any porridge in general) tastes best from little Redik.

[Anastasia]

Anastasia, I completely agree, I also always feel uncomfortable when they categorically say that this or that is necessary

I’ll say more, my family thinks me crazy, yeah .. I have a whole slow cooker and a bread maker.Well, and also that on trifles I do not tell anyone from my own that I bought something, and a dishwasher in my house is generally .. how can I not three! wash the plates with my hands, but what I love and know how to cook and there are at least six plates for each meal + other appliances, salad bowls, etc. ... well, you can't explain to everyone

[Pebble]

Pebble, for me the most delicious oatmeal from a saucepan on gas

Girls, how I love our forum, so many people and all are so different and mostly cool, interesting people

[V-tina]

V-tina, and none of the people around me understands, why do I need all this? The husband is calm, according to the principle "whatever the child is amused". And I wonder, I use everything with pleasure, nothing stands idle.
.... and I drive the dishwasher as much as I want, at least twice a day.
By the way, maybe anyone needs it - a multicooker appeared on Ozone in March 1980, it is with temperature control from 30 to 155 degrees, and time, on any program, and most importantly the price! RUB 4580 I have it. Like!

And I wonder, I use everything with pleasure, nothing stands idle.

By the way, maybe anyone needs it - a multicooker appeared on Ozone in March 1980, it is with temperature control from 30 to 155 degrees, and time, on any program, and most importantly the price! RUB 4580 I have it. Like!

And I sent her back, got caught with a marriage, an electronics glitch. I connected it to the network, and it began to switch to all programs by itself, and in addition, it was also warming up.

[irman]

irman, sorry .... Will they replace it?

[Anastasia]

Anastasia, I refused, in reviews they often write about this marriage.

[irman]

irman, and now they are on sale again. I talk at the Multicooker for March, it seems that no one talked about such a marriage, but this is how it gets. ... I, pah-pah-pah, works, in order. It's a pity, a pity. ...

Nastya, I'm just scared already.

I'm just scared already.

Did you order another one? We have already concocted a topic here

https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&topic=426981.new#new

This Lumme is almost the same as MARTA MT-1989, I almost ordered it, there is a promotion on MultiMart for 3999 with a second bowl as a gift, and it’s right that it slowed down: the LU-1447 SMART has an additional touch mode Express, which is not available in Martha

Did you order another one? We have already concocted a topic here

Ordered, ordered. for 3799 also with add. bowl. Wauuuuuu ...

Wauuuuuu ...

Oh, and now I'm waiting for pictures I want live and testing

Personally, only one thing comforts me - no matter how much I would like another multicooker (3-L Panasik and 70th Redmond live at home) - and the wiring will not pull ... Although it was already - both multicooker puffed along with the x / n, as I perverted with extension cords ...

But all the same, I'm wondering - if you do not take into account porridge for spinogryz, what do you cook in a 3-liter multicooker and what is it more convenient for cooking than a 5-liter?

[Varcomult]

Varcomult, I cook everything in three rubles, in kopeck pieces and even in 1.6 liters. The portions are just smaller. This is the same as in a saucepan on the stove - you can cook the soup in a "bucket" or in a "pot". For me personally, 5 liters is convenient for stewed fruit, for frying followed by stewing a large piece of meat, if you suddenly need to cook more soup (this is rarely very). The rest of the time the fives are idle.

what do you cook in a 3-liter multicooker

Small portions Small baked goods, small casseroles. Boil a little soup, boil 0.5 - 1 multi-glass of rice or buckwheat.
Even a 3-liter one is too big, let alone a five-liter one to smear ...

So, if you do not arrange a gourd meal, bungle pilaf or buckwheat with meat for four at one meal, a 3-liter MV will be enough?

Still, there are not real three liters, but probably less useful volume, or am I mistaken?

Still, there are not real three liters, but probably less useful volume

Yes, 2-2.5 liters
If you have 4 people in your family, then you need a 5 liter of course, we have families of 2 people.

If you have 4 people in your family

there are two + a cat in the family, but the cat doesn't like food from the multicooker

a child and / or mother-in-law may come, for example, for dinner, so the talk is about usually cooking for two, but sometimes it is necessary for 3-4 at one meal. Will 3-liters be enough?

ps. for large volumes there is a 5-liter, the flour of choice is a small MV.

Will 3-liters be enough?

Enough of course Only a small mule is more difficult to choose