tata-nata
Thank you all for the tips I love our forum for the responsiveness
Now they phoned the store, confirmed the order. Approximately he will arrive at the pick-up point on March 31. It remains to wait a little
addresat
Quote: Admin
And it's not enough for you that the owners of MARTA on the forum spoke positively about the durability of these pots?
and not about Martha, but about all Teflon coatings in multicooker in general.
Wit
Quote: Marpl
Why only one person? Everyone is interested, post it here.
Sorry, Marina, for being late. I'll post it in the late afternoon



Added on Tuesday 28 Mar 2017 12:20 pm

Quote: Rituslya
I don't praise anything, because there is still no ideal in my multipark.
That is why I am also silent. Although my multicooker Brand 502 is not worse than the March one. Above, on pages 607 and 608, I wrote about her and showed what she can do. And the cup is still like new because of the respect for it. About the paddle cover, he also wrote what kind of animal it is and what they eat it with. I drew attention to the fact that in Europe dishes with a "ceramic" coating are ranked as "easy-clean", that is, easy to clean, but not "non-stick" - non-stick.
Admin
Quote: addresat
but in general about all Teflon coatings in multicooker.

Here, too, you can trust the opinions of our users of pots, according to the models of each - ours will tell the truth
Admin

Who is interested in MARCH - sale of multicooker-pressure cookers on the official site "MEGA-SALE" 🔗
Miranda
And for more than 2.5 years now, Brand 701 + add. non-stick bowl.

The native ceramic bowl is used only for fermented milk products. So as good as new from the day of purchase. Usually it is 32-38 degrees, but when cottage cheese, then up to 80 degrees.

Add. I changed the non-stick bowl after about 2 years, that is, recently. Because scratches made by accident by a stone in the ring during washing began to stick. But I didn't throw it away, when I steam something, I use it, or stew it.

About 701 there are reviews on milk porridge not very much, that it is better to cook such in the manual mode, and not on the machine. But I don’t do milk porridge at all, so I have never encountered any incorrect work.

All programs suit me, and I am delighted with fermented milk (yogurt, sour cream, cottage cheese)! I love my 701 machine very much. In terms of size, programs, non-glitches, bowls - everything suits.

If I start a second cartoon, then it will be a thing with extended functionality - with a stirrer, etc. But simply more / less, fries / soars + - better / worse - I don't want to, because everything is fine anyway, there is no unambiguous ideal ...
Wit
By request Marina-Marpl I spread the information on the so-called. "ceramic" coating.

What is "ceramic"? In short, the main constituent is polyorganosiloxane. Such a gel With ceramics it has only silicon in common. And even then not in pure form, but its oxides. SiO.

This is written by a tableware seller. If you need a link, then I'll look. She was here. And you can find it yourself by googling. Here's a quote:

"" ... This is the result of the manufacturers' unscrupulous use of the name "ceramic coating": almost all, ninety-nine percent, buyers are sure that the "ceramic" coating entirely consists of the ceramics from which ceramic pots and porcelain plates are made. A small number of doubters simply do not understand how clay pottery can be non-stick. And no one realizes that in their pan is the same polymer as PTFE .... "

And here's another from there:

"... Some manufacturers write that their" ceramic "coating consists of natural materials.Another manufacturer NaturePan says: "The composition of the non-stick ceramic coating contains only natural materials such as: sand, water, stones." But there are no inorganic atoms (Si, Ti, Al), combined with organic radicals in nature. Buyers, having read about this composition, think that these stones are melted with sand, then poured into a pan, this is the ceramic coating ... "

By Greblon

Enough detailed information on the site. The manufacturer of this coating is indeed a German company. she has a permanent representative office in Russia. Some Russian aluminum cookware manufacturers use coatings from this coating manufacturer. C3 + is a premium 3-layer PTFE-based reinforced coating and CK2 is a 2-layer sol-gel "ceramic" coating 🔗 There is also a comparison in the description. Polyethyl teraphtolate versus polyorganosiloxane, that's the whole natural component.
🔗

And this is from the topic "Utensils for cooking" The topic is very large. Answers of the director of the Belarusian saucepan spruce plant.

Quote: konkolla from 06 Dec. 2012, 17:24
Recently, on some news portal, I came across a message that Europe banned the sale of all dishes that have a perfectly white ceramic non-stick coating. Since the natural color of ceramics is yellowish or brownish, some extremely harmful acid is used to bleach it. Some of this acid remains in the ceramics, and when heated, it turns into food ...
Who heard about this? After reading the first part of the topic, I realized that the so-called "ceramics" is not such at all, but still I wonder why such a perfectly white color is achieved?

Eh, an expert would come here ... Mr. Catlery, although too harsh, but something sensible, maybe he would utter about this ...

Well, if so, let me share with you what I think about this: in fact, these are all ordinary Internet stories. Because the "ceramic" coating is not non-stick at all, but just easy to clean. And there is no ceramics there - what kind of ceramics can be if the consequences of the sol-gel process are baked at + 180C. The fact that gives some properties to the surface is called polyorganosiloxane (silicone), which can be painted without problems in any color, including white without any "acid". In short, the usual PR war. Since there is some kind of "acid" in PTFE coatings, why not "find" it in the so-called "ceramic" coating. The Italians have long seen this situation and rivet pans with a normal high-quality PTFE coating, which will work for at least 3 years, and in the annotations they boldly write "ceramic coating" or "coating with ceramic particles". such is the "subtle" marketing ploy.

Here's another.

Quote: marinastom on Dec 27. 2012, 08:37
But mine is not a stainless steel, but with AP. So the droplets are collecting, and I'm afraid to overheat. Suddenly I'll ruin the new thing, it's a pity!


If you have an aluminum frying pan with AP, then the approach and methods of frying should be completely different. There is already polymer on the pan - if you have a traditional coating, it is PTFE. and if ceramic, then polyorganosiloxane. It is these polymers that ensure the non-sticking of the product in the first place. The surface itself has poor wettability (this is a physical property of the aforementioned polymers), which is why both liquid and oil roll into balls and drops without spreading into a film. The surface is initially "oily". In principle, you can not use oil for frying at all, if frying on polymer does not bother. Thermal conductivity for PTFE and polyorganosiloxane is different - for PTFE it is low, and for polyorganosiloxane it is very good, like all silicon-containing polymers. This naturally leads to the approach to heating pans with such coatings. But in any case, an aluminum frying pan with AP should not be heated at all like an uncoated stainless pan, it will not end well.A frying pan with a ceramic coating can be slightly greased, put the product in it and then heated, again controlling the process. This little oil will be just that indicator that will allow you not to overheat both the frying pan and the product. The main thing is not to jump over the smoking temperature of the oil, then the dish will not burn and the coating in the pan will not suffer. With PTFE coating it is a little easier - it can be heated up to 150-170C and only then put the product there, again lightly greasing the pan. Again, using oil not as a raw material for obtaining a carcinogen, but as an indicator of overheating. From all of the above, the obvious conclusion follows that an aluminum frying pan with AP and a stainless frying pan with a mini or microgrill are, as they say, two big differences.

This link will take you to the above topic:
https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&topic=173600.0

It is interesting about bowls of bread makers and cartoons

And here is a great proof article from a scientific point of view.

About "ceramic" coating

Unfortunately, these reviews will only be misleading for many. This "non-sticking" will soon pass (in a year or two). And if you accidentally overheat the frying pan,: think:: mil5: ... After all, there is only one name for "ceramic" in this coating, and you will fry it all on siloxane - silicone grease, which, when burned out, makes further use of the frying pan almost impossible - to it everything starts to stick. And this can happen quite quickly, the siloxane conducts heat very well, so it is quite easy to overheat the pan.
The concept of "ceramics" is now widely interpreted and refers to simple oxides, carbides, nitrides and other compounds. But this is a scientific interpretation. Traditional ceramics go through a high-temperature firing stage. Ceramic coatings are not subject to high-temperature firing, therefore they cannot be classified as ceramics. They are considered ceramic only because of the inclusion of silicon and oxygen in their composition ... (then glass with sand can be called that).
This is the result of the manufacturers' unscrupulous use of the name "ceramic coating": almost all, ninety-nine percent of buyers are sure that the "ceramic" coating entirely consists of the ceramics from which ceramic pots and porcelain plates are made. A small number of doubters simply do not understand how clay pottery can be non-stick. And no one realizes that in their pan the same polymer as PTFE. When you explain in consultation that newfangled ceramics are nothing more than cured silicone, adequate buyers react correctly and choose PTFE pans. And many are now beginning to understand that talk about the dangers of Teflon is nothing more than a journalistic duck of the yellow press, generously funded by someone ...
And Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor Elena Malysheva should be called to account for her words, together with the manufacturer of pans. What is the basis of her statement: "I think that ceramic coated dishes are the most correct dishes for health." As a scientist of high rank, she should know that this must be substantiated by scientific methods. After all, people think that she cares about their health. How often we hear: “Elena Malysheva told us which dishes are harmful and which are good. Give us the one advised by Elena Malysheva. " (What is the opinion of the medical luminaries about her yourself google.)
If you just go to the Internet, you can find a lot of interesting things about "ceramic" coatings. For example, the substance that is the coating is correctly called an organosilicon polymer or polyorganosiloxane or polysiloxane or polydimethylsiloxane rubber or silicone, etc.
The basis for the production of polysiloxane is tetraethylorthosilicate, which is mixed with ethyl or isopril alcohol and water. Other raw materials can also be used, such as tetrachlorosilane.
Well, isn't it very difficult? Then I think that's enough.
Some manufacturers write that their ceramic coating is made of natural materials.Another manufacturer NaturePan says: "The composition of the non-stick ceramic coating contains only natural materials such as: sand, water, stones." But there are no inorganic atoms (Si, Ti, Al), combined with organic radicals in nature. Buyers, having read about such a composition, think that these stones are melted with sand, then poured into a pan, this is a ceramic coating.
In conclusion.
The main thing that we found out on the Internet is that the “ceramic” coating is organosilicon ceramics or organosilicon polymer. So is it ceramic or plastic? The basis for the production of ceramics are natural materials: clays, kaolins, quartz and pure quartz sands, feldspar, pegmatite, chalk, limestone, dolomite. The preparation of the ceramic mass is carried out by cleaning the raw material from harmful mineral inclusions, crushing, grinding, sifting through sieves, dosing, mixing. Then shaping, drying and firing takes place. “Roasting is the main technological process. As a result of complex physical and chemical transformations occurring at high temperatures, ceramic products acquire mechanical strength. Firing is performed in two steps. For porcelain products at a temperature of 900-950˚С and 1320-1380˚С, for earthenware products 1240-1280˚С and 1140-1180˚С. "[I will not give a reference to the literature. Anyone interested - write in a personal] There is no other definition of ceramics. "Ceramic" coatings do not contain such materials and do not go through such a technological cycle. This means they are not ceramic.
We open the encyclopedia. She calls organosilicon polymers plastic.
There was no mention anywhere that organosilicon polymers are ceramics.
It turns out that the coating on pans with a "ceramic" coating is plastic. This is consumer deception. Consumers think the pans are covered in real ceramics. If you announce that the "ceramic" coated pans are actually coated with plastic, who will buy them? It makes sense to change one plastic for another, moreover, more expensive and less durable. It makes no sense for the buyer, he has only losses from the frequent change of dishes. The whole point lies in the manufacturer's pocket.
All! Do not wash "ceramics" in the dishwasher. And don't jump too much on the beautifully named Thermolon.



Natea
Tell me, are the bowls interchangeable in March 1989 and 4313? It seems that they are similar in appearance / volume. Maybe someone tried a successful bowl from 1989 to 4313 to use.
Rituslya
I don't have Martha 1989, but her sister Lummishka is. Lummishka and Martha have 4313 bowls, yes, they are interchangeable.
I did not understand the joystick of the 4313 model. It's easier for me with buttons.
Natea
Quote: Rituslya
I still did not understand the joystick of the 4313 model. It's easier for me with buttons.
Um, and for some reason, on the contrary, I thought that it was more convenient with the joystick; just because of the joystick I looked at her, but the bowl was embarrassing.
Rituslya
Quote: Natea
here is the cup confused
no, I'm not going to say anything bad about the cup. I alternate it with my own Lyummishkina and am very pleased: the coating is smooth, nothing sticks, it is easy to wash off.
But time will tell, yes.
Omka
Natea,
Well, in the description of bowls on the multimart there is a list of which models they fit. Both five-liter bottles are available for both 4313 and 1989.
Logically, a native from 1989 should fit ... probably.
You can call them and ask ...
Marpl
Vitaly, thanks for the informative article. I read it purely for informational purposes. We often consider something harmful - eggs, milk, butter, but time passes and the opinion is absolutely opposite. If you dig so deep, then in general everything is harmful. Therefore, from everything harmful, we will choose the less harmful and convenient for us in everyday life.
addresat
Girls, and someone has Martha 4301 or 4308 - you can measure the cup. I have left over from the old multi non-stick Teflon - though not native, I ordered it from China about 5 years ago (then there was a terrible shortage for bowls). She is still working for me, I wish she could be added to a new cartoon as a replacement.
BlackHairedGirl
Omka, Thank you. I was overjoyed early.It's a shame, of course. Let's look further. I have not yet met a multi, which would be ideally suited for a bowl from Panasonic 18. Slow cooker mode - yes, languor at 79-80 *.
Does Martha have a drip tray? The photo is not clear.
Omka
Tatyana,
It's a pity that I confused everyone ...
Martha 1989 does not have a drip tray, everything drips onto a wide side. As for me, it is more convenient, washing the drip tray at Panas is still a pleasure ... but it's purely IMHO. And the inner cover is removed - after Panas, I'm delighted.
About anguish.
I do not use such modes, somehow it did not work out - there is simply nothing to cook like that. A couple of times we did the jelly - on the program of the same name, it seemed normal (I don’t like him, but my husband seemed happy). Once I tried porridge in the Russian oven mode - here it is languor in its pure form, but it seemed harsh, it did not take root.
Milk porridges are good, but different than in Panas. My son likes Panas more, so I cook in it, just to eat.
But the side dishes - rice, buckwheat - I like more in March, they are drier there. And it's convenient that you put it on 20 minutes and you know that everything will be ... touch modes are good for postponing, and if right away, it's better (for me) to set it yourself.
I like baked goods in March, frying, soup, broth. I also make yogurt and bake meat in foil (boiled pork program).
In short, I wanted a multi-cook, but in the end I cook on automatic programs.
And, here's another thing I like - if you make a change in an automatic program, then it remembers and the next time you do not need to expose. I fry a chicken on the Fry, an hour, 140 - next time he will offer all these numbers. It is convenient.
Oh, how much I wrote. Maybe it will come in handy
Marisha Aleksevna
Quote: Omka
side dishes - rice, buckwheat - I like it more in March
Olga and what is the ratio of cereal and water do you take? In Panasonic I have 1: 2, but in March, how?
Quote: Omka
About languor
She cooked borsch, Tanya Admin has a recipe in March 1989. It turned out stewed borscht, very tasty.
Wit
Brand 502 has a drip tray. Why wash it? I poured the water and put it back. Yes, the side was wiped dry, although it remains practically dry. I’m dull somehow - why wash the drip tray with water from water ?!
Rituslya
For me, for example, as it turned out, so the drip tray is secondary.
The primary is a removable plate on the lid.
I just can't find a cartoon to combine the secondary with the primary.
shade
Peace be with you bakers!
In Panas groats before evaporation
And in March, only buckwheat in 20 minutes has time on Saturday, wild rice put solid cereal in a glass of water after 25 minutes, I had to start it again \ now I put 40 minutes at once \
Omka
Marisha Aleksevna,
According to the recipe from Martha's manual, 150 grams of cereal per 300 ml of water. In principle, also 1 to 2

Wit,
As they say, all the markers in the box taste and color are different.
I regularly forget about the drip tray at Panas - yes, that's the kind of pig I am, then the devil knows what happens ... brr
But the drip tray is a trifle, as for me. But the removable inner cover is convenient
Wit
Omka, very comfortably! Mine is also removed
madames
Guys! I have a very good cartoon Toshiba for milk porridge and cereals. Everything always works out great, nothing escapes, is not digested, everything is as I need it. Yes, even in it I make cottage cheese casseroles with cherries in an hour. Satisfied! And I ordered March 1989 for meat second, roasting and jellied meat. Will come one of these days, I will try. Look for equipment for yourself and for your menu. Good luck with your choice.
Admin
Quote: Omka
I regularly forget about the drip tray at Panas - yes, that's the kind of pig I am, then the devil knows what happens ... brr

And it's true What I don't like the collection behind the pots, you remember it when it's time to send the multicooker to the bathhouse and there ... words cannot describe what was there It was in Panas and in Kukushka

With a wide rim it is better, you open the lid, and all the liquid-condensate immediately falls on the rim, just wipe the constant control with a sponge, which you will not forget, it is in front of our eyes
BlackHairedGirl
And I'm used to it, I check it every time. Girls, we will think thanks.
Lerele
And which is better - Martha or Phillips ???
While reading, but began to think
addresat
but I, on the contrary, did not really like to remove water from the rim in my cartoon ... now I want to try it with a drip tray. So, how many people - so many opinions ...
anavi
People, please advise a small cartoon with good bowl coverage, with a minimum of bells and whistles for a very elderly woman! She only needs soups, cereals, vegetables and compotes! I am sitting in the internet, looking for models - well, I just don't understand what to choose! And, of course, inexpensive ...
Admin
Quote: anavi
advise a small cartoon with good bowl coverage, with a minimum of bells and whistles for a very elderly woman!

I can recommend this one, it helps me a lot Multicooker baby Redmond RMC-01 - what can she cook! (or what can I do?)

And it serves me without problems for several years, 3-4 years for sure
anavi
Admin, yes, Tatyan, I was the first to look at her - my daughter and my mother have one. But! It is now at a price - under 5 thousand! So I brushed it off!


Added Wednesday 29 Mar 2017 06:17 PM

Here I look at Filipka 3060 ... March 1970 or 1965 - but they are nowhere to be found ... And what else is possible ... I myself have a second multi Panas 10 - but it is also nowhere to be found, and if there is - again the price already I have it in general for 1500 rubles. a couple of years ago I took ...
Marpl
Today I received March 1989 + cup CK2. I have never had an oval-shaped MV (except for Panasonic 101 by 3 liters, but it takes up little space), more and more round. So it takes up 1.5 times more space on the table, but lower in height. I decided to cook chicken soup, chose the Frying program to sauté onions with carrots, I press Start, but the program does not start. It turns out that in this MV, you need to hold the Start button a little, then the program will turn on. And I already thought that on sale again some kind of marriage was brought (as was the case with Shteba for 6L). It was necessary to write in the manual that Start should be pressed a little longer than as a choice of programs. I also have touch-sensitive buttons in MV Endever, but there they are all pressed the same way - quickly. So, whoever faced such a problem for the first time, just hold the Start button (as well as Heating) and everything will be fine.
And as for the fact that some people think that the joystick in the MV is not very convenient, the opposite is true - they can very quickly select the desired program. Even if you missed, you just go back quickly in the opposite direction. Really much faster and more convenient.
Rituslya
Quote: Marpl
some people think that the joystick in MB is not very convenient
he was extremely uncomfortable to me. I even got tired of this multicooker, which is the first time in my vast multipark. Maybe she’s with my marriage?
Maybe with marriage, but that's not mine at all. I wanted to pass, but too lazy zhezh, and can not take back.
Oh well ... I like to spank with buttons.
Marpl
When there are few programs it can use buttons and it is convenient, and when there are many of them, much faster with a joystick. Buttons back on the missed program will not return, you have to start all over again, and the joystick just left and right, beauty.
Rituslya
Quote: Marpl
much faster with a joystick
agree.
But I can't do it at all. That's just really. After the first turn on, I was even upset.
At least she chopped off the cup from her, which is not so offensive.
I'm just like that. I share, as they say, my impressions.
Omka
anavi,
Filka 3060 is a very worthy choice, but everything is not easy with cereals in it (that's just three days I've been mastering it).
Still, in terms of simplicity and reliability - Panas. Especially if the cereals are needed.
My mother gave me Panasik-10 - happy, cooks porridge, pilaf.
See also Polaris.
https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&topic=470694.0
They are good to everyone, including the price (there is now a discount on them in Yulmart), but get ready to buy a cup for it. At a price close to Panas ....
anavi
Quote: Omka
but get ready to buy a cup for her
OmkaThank you Olga for your answer. Yes, Filipka is embarrassed by the girls' comments about cereals. And Polaris looked - and also realized that they had no cups! And I would love to buy Panasik for her - but ... but ... they are not there, and the price is already astronomical ...
addresat
Marpl, Marina, congratulations! I have read about Martha here and, under the impression, tried to order Marta 4308 with a ceramic pan on another online store. And then something Polaris my somewhere lost ... And I already want to cook porridge, and without a multicooker, the handles are no longer on the stove to cook it ... you quickly get used to good things ...
Lenat
anavi, about Polaris ... - I have 0350 and 0349. The bowl for soups, cereals and compotes is normal.In 0350 there are a minimum of buttons and programs, but all you need is there
Rituslya
I read for a couple of days, but all the talk is about Martha.
What is Martha ?!
Well, nothing like a slow cooker.
But the last Filki are very good, and the same Shteba can be adapted for a multicooker, and Reds ...
And Brands are not bad at all.
And Poliki has a place to be.
anavi
Lenat, Elena, and the groats do not burn? Is there buckwheat, rice? And milk porridges don't run like in Filipka? That is, do you think it's better to take 350? I myself already had three Polaris, however, 517 - one still works in the country. And about little girls on our forum write - the bowls are bad! The 517 is also unsuccessful - ceramic! I bought teflon from Redmond - and everything is fine!


Added Wednesday 29 Mar 2017 08:13 PM

Rituslya, Rituel, you, as the owner of the park of mules and stoves, would advise!
Rituslya
anavi, Olik, I would not recommend one thing, because I have just a bunch of them. So ... You can talk.
Unfortunately, I don't have an ideal in my multipark.
anavi
Quote: Rituslya
Unfortunately, I don't have an ideal in my multipark.
Let's search, Rituel!
Omka
Quote: Rituslya
I read for a couple of days, but all the talk is about Martha.
What is Martha ?!
Yes, just the discounts on them were really delicious at the weekend. But the girlfriend herself campaigned to buy.
Everyone will switch to another mega sale soon
Rituslya
Quote: Omka
just the discounts on them were really delicious at the weekend
Not at all...
These discounts are permanent. I also bought my Martha a couple of months ago for inexpensive.
Omka
Rituslya,
Well, right now, no, although often, yes. On New Year's Eve they were definitely.
My girlfriend thought for a long time. Let's wait for a new sale
Rituslya
I really liked the last Filka. Highly! Programs are just a dream, but again I will not say good things.
Personally, I got a nonsense bowl. Bad, you might say. Quite nasty.
So I won't even tell Filka's numbers.
Admin
Quote: Rituslya
What is Martha ?!
Well, nothing like a slow cooker.
But the last Filki are very good, and the same Shteba can be adapted for a multicooker, and Reds ...
And Brands are not bad at all.
And Poliki has a place to be.

And what did you go through MARTA? If you don't have a multicooker, then you don't need to judge categorically

For me, for example, all the others are not needed from those listed. With the staff, love did not work out right away, I had to give the child - it was not my style, but I'm not talking nasty about her
And I try not to say nasty things to other multicooker, because I am not familiar with them and there is nothing to say, and I don’t want to make a mistake
Why so categorically offend the owners of MARTA, they are people too
Marpl
Tatyana, I have a question for you. How does frying work work? I used to turn on this mode by pouring oil on the bottom for frying. Today I did just that, but after a while the MV began to peep - probably gained temperature (160), but by this time my vegetables were already half fried. That is, it turns out that she works like Shteba - until she warms up, do not put food. And the manual says - do not turn on when the bowl is empty. How is it correct?
madames
But I'm also looking forward to Martochka with pleasure. My Marta arrived in a neighboring city, at the pick-up point, there is no delivery to us. You have to go and pick it up yourself. Maybe I'll get together tomorrow, if my health permits.
Marpl! What are your first impressions? What did you cook and how did it work out? Does the lid close tightly? Like? CONGRATULATIONS!!
Admin well done! Everyone can talk about their device: the pros, cons, conveniences, versatility, what joy or pleasure your assistant and ally in the kitchen brings you. This makes it easier for us to find out what to look at, pay attention and make a choice for ourselves. Good luck everyone.
Marpl
First impressions of March 1989, probably like any other acquisition, are positive. I already wrote above, the Start and Heating buttons do not turn on quickly, but you need to hold it a little longer, then they turn on. But you yourself will understand the difference when you press the buttons to select the program and these buttons. There is not a word about this in the manual.I just quickly typed programs and then also Start. And I could not understand why after 30 seconds everything was reset and returned to its original form. Then I figured it out by typing. Made soup from the recipe book, everything is fine. Keeps heat well, heating can be turned off immediately. I will further figure out what's what. The lid closes tightly during the cooking process, and the first time I often opened the lid, nothing dripped onto the rim, everything is clean. Probably this is plus 3D heating, which means that nothing will drip from above when baking.

All recipes

New recipe

© Mcooker: best recipes.

map of site

We advise you to read:

Selection and operation of bread makers