Choosing a multicooker, pressure cooker, rice cooker (2)

Already, gritting my heart, I wanted to take the DEX-65, but I went to Eldorado in the evening and bought a Zelmer EK1300 for a ridiculous 399 UAH. Promotional price, everywhere they are more expensive. It's just a pity, I didn't find a topic on it here.

And there is no such topic here. We all discussed it, but nobody bought it. You will be the first

How many multicookers came out, that I'm tired of remembering .. you remember how it was, once or twice and a mustache ... and now I went to the site Polaris, and there Mamadaragaya .... went to Vitek ... also eyes in different directions. .. thank God I calmed down, handed out too much, there were two multi and one pressure cooker, I had enough with my head :-)

Why is it so ? You can give the old ones all the time, give them away, and buy and buy new ones ...

And there is no such topic here. We all discussed it, but nobody bought it. You will be the first

I got it.

I read, I read .... I do not understand ... does it make sense to spend almost 10 tons. on mv PANASONIC SR-MHS181WTQ or stop at mv PANASONIC SR-TMJ181 BTW. Maybe someone will enlighten? I’ll pull any financially, so it makes sense to take the 2nd option or the price for unnecessary navaroty ...? it seems that the kids want to make yogurt at home, but with a difference in price, you can buy them for this amount. I will say one thing, thanks to the forum I chose an excellent bread maker and I am very happy, it is not difficult to guess which company

[848]

848, PANASONIC SR-TMJ181 BTW is an ancient multicooker with a new body and a more durable bowl cover

She is quiet, slow. Excellent baking, calm stewing, excellent touch modes. "Milk porridge" by the set time (not everyone is good at it in this mode).

PANASONIC SR-MHS181WTQ is a new model. Therefore, the price is higher.

She has touch controls. The baking is more intense than the old model. There is no "Yogurt" mode, but it is possible to set 40 ° C in "Manual" mode (although the temperature stability is worth checking). In addition to "Plov" and "Buckwheat", the "Milk porridge" mode becomes sensory. In this mode, it is convenient, in addition to cooking porridge, to cook meat in sauce .. there is a "Fry" mode, which was not the case with the old model. True, the temperature is only approx. 130 ° C, but at least something. The bowl coating is the same as SR-TMJ181 BTW.

What to prefer? It's up to you

[ancient]

... this ancient multicooker in a new body and with a more durable coating ...

Yeah, I would buy two rays for five thousand rubles. more functional ..... pressure cooker and multicooker

What to prefer? It's up to you

Thanks for the answer, there is something to think about. When I wrote about yoghurt, I meant just the function of a multi-cook (the ability to set the temperature to 40g).
I read more reviews about a multicooker with a pressure cooker function .... on Phillips, everything is very difficult ... little positive, but they praise MOULINEX Cook4me CE 701132 and the bowl there is ceramic .... can you tell me anything about it?

pressure cooker and multicooker

Which pressure cooker would you choose?

MOULINEX Cook4me CE 701132 and the bowl is ceramic .... can you tell me anything about it?

Eeyore then? In it, as I understood, the recipes are "sewn in", only according to them he prepares. I don’t know, in my opinion, all this is superfluous for additional money. Better then just buy a pressure cooker. And the girls also said that the milk porridge in this pressure cooker can "run", apparently, due to the steam release algorithm (but, to be honest, I did not delve deeply into this problem).
And a bowl with a "ceramic" coating requires other than a non-stick coating, care, so that it does not stick in the near future (heat only with food, wash thoroughly every time after cooking with the hard side of a not new sponge, never leaving particles of food never washed off on coating.

Which pressure cooker would you choose?

Can I answer? I know This is Shteba

A bowl with a "ceramic" coating requires other than a non-stick coating, care,

oooooh, my head is spinning, I really want to spend money, so that later it does not gather dust in the corner ... I’m already thinking about a separate pressure cooker and a good cartoon.

I've already thought about a separate pressure cooker and a good Mullet.

You will first decide what you need an electric saucepan for, see how important it is for you to open the lid during cooking (pressure cookers do not have this option), is it important to quickly cook meat, what kind of menu you have, whether frying is important, etc.

This is Shteba

sure you may! I'm only FOR (for any advice).

I haven't come across something like this anywhere else on websites ...

HERE the second part of the topic is about her. We are all in love with her forum only ... You are not from Ukraine, by any chance?

[848]

848 Regarding the new Panasonic with a multi-cook. The bowl is not the same as in previous models, the coating is more like the coating of a Panasonic bread machine. I am delighted with him. She is quicker than the previous ones. I also had the one made of stainless steel, I was also pleased with it, maybe because it was generally my first multicooker, with which my entire technopark began. The controls are not sensory. It is exactly the same as in previous models, push-button.

The bowl is not the same as in previous models, the coating is more like the coating of a Panasonic bread machine.

The coating of the bowl is the same as in the renewed "old lady" (No, not quite that, but the coverage of the Panasonic SR-TMH181HTW is better than that of the 18th model) And it is the same as in the new models of Panasonic bread makers

The controls are not sensory.

Yes, exactly, I confused it with Stadler

The coverage is the same as in the latest HP Panasonic model.

as in the latest HP Panasonic model.

Yeah, "diamond fluoride"

By the way, the difference between this bowl in Panasonic SR-MHS181 and previous models is that it has a thickened bottom

HERE the second part of the topic is about her. We are all in love with her forum

Well, and the whole forum? No, Shteba, of course, has its pluses and highlights, but in my opinion, she is just a good compromise with limited opportunities - financial and spatial.

Well, and the whole forum?

Okay, not everyone ... many on the forum Personally, I am attracted to it by the opportunity to have two bowls, one of which is steel, and there is the possibility of adjusting the temperature on the "Heating". Good quality. The design is unusual.

Yeah, and for some people, the temperature does not change on heating. And the bowls are not for sale.

Yes, that's why I asked 848 if she was from Ukraine

Well, and the whole forum? No, Shteba, of course, has its pluses and highlights, but in my opinion, she is just a good compromise with limited opportunities - financial and spatial.

Well, you shouldn't be talking about a compromise.
And Steba's capabilities cannot be compared with Binaton! It lacks half of what is in Shtebe.
Great pressure cooker! Show me one similar one.
And the fact that you did not like it and you are used to the fact that electronics does everything for you, then this claim should not be made to Shteba.
There were many complaints about Binaton, but that did not mean that he was bad.
And Binaton has a bowl, you yourself wrote that everything sticks. And Shteba does not and will not have such problems, which is very important!
I have nothing against it, this is my personal opinion.

I have Kuku 1051, she is also smart and does everything herself. But I would never trade Steba for such a smart and slow pressure cooker.
And I also have Orson 4002, he is also completely himself everything, but the smell from him lasted a whole month of use.
This is what I mean, what I can compare and in vain I will not praise Steba))
Each has its own advantages!
But in preparation for the holidays, Shteba is simply not replaceable !!!

[enthusiastic]

Well, you shouldn't be talking about a compromise.
And Steba's capabilities cannot be compared with Binaton! It lacks half of what is in Shtebe.
Great pressure cooker! Show me one similar one.
And the fact that you did not like it and you are used to the fact that electronics does everything for you, then this claim should not be made to Shteba.
There were many complaints about Binaton, but that did not mean that he was bad.
And Binaton has a bowl, you yourself wrote that everything sticks. And Shteba does not and will not have such problems, which is very important!
I have nothing against it, this is my personal opinion.

I have Kuku 1051, she is also smart and does everything herself. But I would never trade Steba for such a smart and slow pressure cooker.
And I also have Orson 4002, he is also completely himself everything, but the smell from him lasted a whole month of use.
This is what I mean, that I can compare and in vain I will not praise Steba))
Each has its own advantages!
But in preparation for the holidays, Shteba is simply not replaceable !!!

Firstly, I do not scold Shteba and recognize some exclusivity in her - such a range of modes - from a slow cooker to a pressure cooker is really present and this is a plus for Shteba. The presence of a steel bowl is also an indisputable plus of Shteba. The design is also non-standard and quite attractive - this is also a plus. ALL! I don't see any pros anymore.
Pro Binaton You are nowhere mine enthusiastic you will not find reviews. And I have no way to compare Binaton with the Cuckoo. I am sure that Binaton will lose in many respects, except for the price. Binatoshi has some drawbacks, and the main drawback is the ceramic coating of the bowl. No, it's not bad for a ceramic coating. Still, I've been using it for two years and I'm not going to write it off. But I admit that the cover of the Panasonic 4-year-old bowl is still easier to maintain.
How exactly the Binaton pressure cooker is better than Steba. And not because I'm just used to it. Any device of narrow "specialization" can be made more comfortable than "multitasking". Now, if you already have a slow cooker, sous-vid maker, yogurt maker, or you don't need these devices at all, then why are these functions in Shtebe? That is why I think that Shteba is a good "compromise" device. With limited capabilities, it allows you to combine all this. We are all different - everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I am writing all this only because Shteba is almost erected on a pedestal here. And this is just a good, decent electric pan, but far from ideal.

HERE the second part of the topic is about her. We are all in love with her forum. Only ... You are not from Ukraine, by any chance?

no, not from Ukraine, we are local flax. region

and what does it change, what is wrong in Ukraine or here? I didn't get it ...

no, not from Ukraine, we are local flax. region

and what does it change, what is wrong in Ukraine or here? I didn't get it ...

It's just that a stripped-down version of Shteba is being sold in Ukraine.
And in Russia she can do anything! Yogurt, slow brewing, and so on and so forth)
Yes, her pastries are superb, but she will have to buy a teflon-coated bowl)

and what does it change, what is wrong in Ukraine or here? I didn't get it ...

In Ukraine, Shteba has reduced the ability to change the temperature on the Heating. And, as I understand it, bowls with a non-stick coating (steel included) cannot be purchased

I am writing all this only because Shteba is almost erected on a pedestal here. And this is just a good, decent electric pan, but far from ideal.

Well, no one raises on a pedestal))
This Panasonic is being built, although I have nothing against it, maybe a good multicooker and I also have it)

By the way, I don't even get a yogurt maker, but I do it in the staff. I put it at night and that's it)
And for the sous-vid, it is more convenient for me to separate the Su-vid Shtebv, since the pressure cooker is also busy for a long time. And I have two children and my husband is hungry)
And a slow cooker, I bought it before Shteba)

I'm right. understood, you mean Steba DD 1 ECO, 5 l.? do you recommend it as a pressure cooker or 2 in 1 yet?

and so ... THANK YOU ALL FOR THE FEEDBACK, in my head at least some understanding of "what I want" drew !!!

Yes, yes, we are talking about Shteba DD 1 This is purely a pressure cooker, not at all two in one. It's just that she has expanded capabilities due to the ability to change the temperature on the Heating.

Oh, what a tautology came out. Sorry

Yes, we are talking about Shteba DD 1

Thanks again for the answers! decided I ordered it on ozone ... there is now a gift and the bowl comes with a non-stick
I'm waiting for it now

[Olga]

Olga, I just want to warn you once again that Shteba is a pressure cooker, that is, when cooking under pressure, the lid cannot be opened and you cannot look into the saucepan during cooking. Why do I pay attention to this? Because for many, this moment is decisive for choosing between a pressure cooker and a multicooker. But ... in any case, I am sure that you will not stop at Shteba, and soon you will also have a multicooker. One saucepan is good, two is better

Thank you
she already has (slow cooker) only small (for 2 liters) and not at all expensive (no frills) mulinex ... here we cook only porridge (without milk) or an omelet in it, with stewing ... I can't cope with it too change, initially considered a 2in1 multicooker with funkts. pressure cooker (Panasonic), but reviews on it ..., so I came to the conclusion to have a pressure cooker and a good cartoon. I have already ordered a pressure cooker, and now I decide on a new cartoon for Phillips.

[Olga]

Olga, you probably have a rice cooker, not a multicooker. This is some kind of a multi-cooker with a pressure cooker from Panasonic, I don't know something like that

In the steak, you can open the lid on simmering, heating, and Roasting goes with the lid open. Baking without pressure too)
Steam without pressure.

[Mash]

Mash, well, this is obvious, so in all conventional pressure cookers I mean the modes UNDER pressure

sorry, sorry, sorry, it's the other way around ... my head was looking at Phillips as if it were 2in1, but I want new Panasonic

Yeah, of course, Phillips is not 2-in-1. This is a pressure cooker with the ability to cook at high and low temperatures, in almost this sense it is similar to Shteba. Phillips just has more buttons

[Mash]

Mash, well, this is obvious, so in all conventional pressure cookers I mean the modes UNDER pressure

Well yes)))
I just wanted to remind you that there is also longing in it))

I got an order from a friend to bring an inexpensive or cartoon or a pressure cooker.
Her budget is exactly up to 100 euros, that is, up to 4,500 rubles. And I was at a loss for something, at least what to watch, I have not yet chosen the price.
Tell me, there is a choice, that is, Brand has not seen only, but there are so many. Yes, I'm in Krasnoyarsk. Not everything is that in Moscow, for example.
And all with the coming !!!!

Here I gave prices for multicooker. Maybe that I missed

Is volume important? Now Redmond 01 (for 2 liters) can be bought for 1200r (but there are no touch modes, frying is mediocre, a bowl with a "ceramic" coating, but otherwise a great baby). There is also a Cromax 31/32 for 3L at the same price (the bowl is not very, there are difficulties with the timer, the inner lid is not removable, but the modes work wonderfully, as the more expensive ones do not work). More in this price category I have nothing to offer Oh, no ... there is still a Redmond 02 (1.6L) for 2 thousand, but also without touch modes, without a removable plate, but the frying is good.

Also, if a little more expensive, the old lady Panasonic SR-TMH10ATW for 2.5 liters (you can say that there is no frying, but the rice, milk, stewing and baking are excellent), Polaris PMC 0310AD for 3 liters (there is a touch mode, but the bowl with a "ceramic" coating ), Binatone MUC-2130 for 3L (without display).

And if it is even more expensive (to three thousand), then Philips HD3134 / 00 for 3 liters and Binatone MUC-2116 for 1.6 liters (talkative, most of the modes are sensory, smart, without milk), Polaris PMC 0520AD for 5 liters (there is a touch mode), well, REDMOND RMC-011 for 2L (the same as 01, only in black).

4-5 thousand: Stadler Form Chef One for 5L and 4L (out of competition in touch modes and bowl), Brand 502 for 5L (without touch modes, 5-step manual mode, bowl with "ceramic" coating).

6-7 thousand: Brand 37501 for 5L (if you can still find it).

7-8 thousand: Panasonic SR-MHS181 5L (two touch modes: pilaf and buckwheat, maximum temperature 130 ° C, bowl with a resistant coating).

Well, then the gap is up to 13-15 thousand.

Well, the amendments ... Stadler got a 3-liter multicooker. Panasonic also has sensory milk porridge.

Hello everyone, I'm new here, I accidentally stumbled upon your forum, I didn't even hear about multicooker before, and now I’ve read it’s on fire to buy, but I live in Poland and there is not much choice here, only 2: spam Philips HD3037 / 70 and Zelmer EK 1300, advise which is better

Welcome to the Veronica forum!
If I choose only from these two models, then I would choose Philips, 12 programs, the bowl is good (if I am not mistaken as in my brand 37501)
Here is a topic about her
https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&topic=177272.0

[Veronica]

Veronica, on the forum we have not yet compared these models.

In Russia they sell Philips HD3037 / 03 (I can only talk about him, in what its differences from / 70 can not say. Perhaps this is just a sales area code).

Zelmer EK1300 in Russia they sell. Its price is 2 times less than the price of Philips HD3037 / 03.

I can only compare these models theoretically, because in practice I don't know anything about them (all information from the instructions from the official sites)
Philips HD3037 / 03 has three automatic modes: rice, risotto, pilaf (default time 40 minutes, cannot be changed). In addition to them, there are 8 more modes with the ability to adjust the time: jam, cooking, stewing, frying, yogurt, heating, baking, steaming. At the same time, the "Baking" mode is also regulated by temperatures: 40 ° С, 60 ° С, 80 ° С, 100 ° С, 120 ° С, 150 ° С, 180 ° С. That is, this mode can be used not only for baking, but also for frying, making yoghurt, sous vide, etc.

The Philips HD3037 / 03 bowl (judging by the photo) with a non-stick Japanese Daikin coating. Bowl inside gold / bronze color. The coating quality is very decent.

The inner panel (judging by the video) is non-removable (inconvenient to maintain).

The multicooker was produced at the Povos factory.


Zelmer EK1300 has a display of the current time - this is convenient if you use the delayed start (delay) function, that is, the end time of the mode is programmed, and there is no need to calculate how long this should take place.

The bowl has a black non-stick coating, the bottom is "honeycomb" (this is not very easy to clean).

Modes: three types of rice, pasta, meat, vegetables, fish, pastries, soup, porridge, frying, steaming. The menu is not usually organized.

The inner cover panel is removable.


As a result ... I don't know which one to prefer I like the menu and the Phillips bowl, but I don't like the non-removable lid

If I had to choose between Phillips and Zelmer, I would have chosen Phillips (I respect Zelmer's technique, but I would not take the cartoon)

If we neglect the non-removable inner panel of the lid from the Philips, I would also prefer it

The Zelmer EK1300 has a 2.8 l bowl. Philips HD3037 / 70 5L, that is, a zelmer for a small family, or as a second cartoon will do.

Zelmer felt it personally, because the price in MSC has moved up well now. She interested me.
Feels like it is assembled very soundly, everything is fitted. With a small volume, it has a good power of 820W.
3-D heating is not declared. The inner cover is not like all aluminum, but stainless steel. The inside of the heating element is painted black - no spots will be visible there. The inner casing, the same dyed, and has a texture, I don't know how to call it, usually this happens in pressure cookers, not a smooth texture in general. The bowl is very weighty. It seemed to me like in my field 517, or in redmond m70 and the like. And in the 517th it is 600 grams. That is, this bowl cannot be compared, for example, with Polaris PMC 0310AD, in polaris with the same 3 liters there is some kind of fluff bowl. The menu is in English, as the instructions are written, it is not very necessary to understand. There is no multicook. And so, not the worst option.

In Philips HD3037 / 70 and between the Philips HD3037 / 03 model we sell, there are differences in modes along the way.
In / 03 there is porridge, buckwheat, in / 70 jam, risotto.

In general, Phillips is preferable. The quality of the bowl (proven coating), the volume is larger, that is, more versatile, unless, of course, the goal is to buy a small one. There is a "multi-cook type". Power 980w. It's a pity that the cover is not removable.
Ie phillips. Although in your case, Phillips will also have an English menu.

I also found a Polaris PMC 0510AD price of $ 100, Polaris PMC 0520AD price of $ 125, Polaris PMC 0517AD price of $ 155, which company brings from Russia, are these models worthy of attention?