Do Kenwood food processor attachments work with kitchen machines?

Tell me more, please! Are food processor attachments suitable for kitchen machines? And similarly to a meat grinder

[Yulenka]

Yulenka, You mean Kenwood MultiPro combines? I have an old MultiPro from about 2003. A blender and a mini-chopper from it on the old induction stand on a high-speed socket, they even spin, but it's scary to use, because they stand uncertainly. I didn't risk it. Perhaps the fresher harvesters have something changed and better. Kenwood also recently bought a low-speed grater with drums for a meat grinder, the car got into the low-speed nest normally, although that it’s not native, it is still felt, but I use it, everything is fine.

Yes, exactly them. And not sure, how is it? Staggering? Do you hold on while working?

Yes, you need to hold on, and there is a risk that it could spill down, I was leaking a little, why I didn't figure it out.

[AlenKo65]

I was leaking a little,

AlenKo65, Alyona, can leak if the nozzle itself was assembled incorrectly or if the gaskets are torn. The tightness of the nozzle does not depend on the installation on the socket.

YulenkaAs for meat grinders and KM Kenwood, the parallel models on the attachments are absolutely compatible, i.e. it is necessary to look at specific models so that the landing nests are identical.

For example, on AVITO, sometimes literally for a penny a meat grinder of the 700 series flashes, - attachments from burnt-out motors.
These meat grinders of increased diameter (analogue of the 955th nozzle), in contrast to the "standard" sold in the Russian Federation - 950th.
I have just 955, - I am very happy, because it has a diameter of 10, and in 950 it is 8, so I boldly stuff into it a whole fillet of fish and half a fillet of chicken

Good luck!

she has a diameter of 10

10, sorry, what?

[losonogov]

losonogov, we are talking about the diameter of the grating.
IN 🔗 Kenwood is just written 8 or 10, 🔗, - 8 cm and 10 cm.
It is not very clear which grate is meant, because if we talk about the diameter of the standard cutting grate, then it is 62 mm VS 69 mm.
Well, and, accordingly, the inlet in the 955th is larger than in the 950th.

we are talking about the diameter of the grating.

So is the feed hole larger too? How does it fit half a file (I'm afraid to assume that it is) chicken?

is the feed hole larger too?

accordingly, the inlet in the 955th is larger than in the 950th.

How does it fit half a file (I'm afraid to assume that it is) chicken

I stuff a whole fish fillet and half a chicken fillet into it

If someone goes to the grocery store, under the label "fish fillet" he suggests seeing something like this:

And under the label "chicken fillet" - this:

That is, traditionally a fish fillet is half a fish cut along the ridge and freed from bones, and a chicken fillet is a breast, also boneless.
Fish like hake quite well on the filech passes into the hole, large cod or salmon - you have to cut the fillet once along.
It is also enough to cut the chicken fillet lengthwise.

the inlet in 955 is larger than in 950.

I am looking at pictures of these models and it doesn’t look like the input anymore. The grille is more understandable - the broadening at the exit of the older one is clearly noticeable.
The 950 has a loading diameter of 55 mm. How many of yours?