What to choose: LIBERTY MP-900 or POLARIS PPC-0305AD?

Save me, stuck at the stage of choosing between two "little animals": the LIBERTY MP-900 multicooker-pressure cooker and the POLARIS PPC-0305AD multicooker

What do you advise?

I personally lean towards cartoons from Redmond. As for me, they cook quite well, for example, I recently made borscht in my own and it came out surprisingly well.

I have never heard of Liberty. And if you look at Polaris, I would have paid more expensive, but bought Redmond. Somehow it is more reliable and there are more good reviews. Then by the way I came across Puchkov's video, laughed heartily))) Here:

[Polaris PPC 0205AD]

I have never heard of Liberty.

And about Polaris PPC 0205AD have you heard? This is a twin, one to one with Liberty MP-900... It is not worth buying, very bad reputation (negative reviews are almost two thirds of the total).

AlexM, specially chosen among worst models?

If you haven't bought it yet, then the budget model is not bad UNIT USP-1080D - 10 automatic programs, manual setting of cooking time is possible.

If you want a more functional model, then take a closer look at Brand 6051 - 14 automatic programs, multi-cook. And outwardly pretty.

When I chose, I took a long and careful approach to this issue. My cartoon friend Redmond has been working for five years now, and has served faithfully ... I've heard a lot of good things about this brand. Half of my friends girls (on another site) have exactly Redmond, only different models. Everyone has their own preferences. Therefore, I thought about what functions I needed and chose the Redmond M23. I don't regret it at all. Very good cartoon.
You need to choose according to those qualities and functions that are right for you.

[Polaris PPC 0305AD]

Topikstarter chose from pressure cookers - Polaris PPC 0305AD also cooks under pressure, like Liberty MP-900...

Brand 6051 is good for soups, stewing meat, but you can't cook good pilaf in "rice" mode.

Take the Steba DD1 or the brand new DD2, does everything in the previous 5 posts + pressure cooker. It costs less than Redmond and a bit more expensive than Brand, but not China, but Germany. Full information HERE and HERE
By the way, you can make yogurt in both of them.

[Kara]

Kara, and that the new staff has already appeared, I'm waiting for her !!!

Ol, like Manya wrote what is already

[AlexM]

AlexM, specially chosen among worst models?

zogar, why are you doing that? Not fair.
Are there many bad reviews in the Polaris 0305 thread? Almost everyone is very happy! And we figured out the spare pans ...

Save me, stuck at the stage of choosing between two "little animals": the LIBERTY MP-900 multicooker-pressure cooker and the POLARIS PPC-0305AD multicooker
What do you advise?

AlexM, judging by your choice do you live in Ukraine?
I would recommend Polaris. I have been using this pressure cooker for almost a year and I am very happy. Check out the Polaris 0305 thread:https://Mcooker-enn.tomathouse.com/index.php@option=com_smf&topic=295673.0 Ask there interesting questions about this model.

Are there many bad reviews in the Polaris 0305 thread?

Active and more or less advanced users go to the branch, they receive explanations there and correct the not entirely accurate operation of some programs (for example, there are complaints about the burning of a product), coping with problems. Thus, they learn the correct handling of cartoons, become satisfied with its work.

But on YM there are a lot of complainants: out of a total of 17, 10 are negative (approx. 60%). Of course, you need to filter: some complain about the lack of functions that are not offered in this model (you should have read the Manual carefully).
However, whatever you say, but more than half of the negativity is too much. Anyway, among so many models in our market, you can not put up with the shortcomings and make best choice.

I will write objectively about Polaris 0305, she stews meat perfectly and without pretensions, but the removable lid is wildly inconvenient ((((

[zogar,]

Active and more or less advanced users go to the branch, they receive explanations there and correct the not entirely accurate work of some programs (for example, there are complaints about the burning of the product), coping with the problems. Thus, they learn the correct handling of cartoons, become satisfied with its work.

But there are a lot of complainants on YM: choice.

zogar, You are wrong. The beauty of this model is that nothing needs to be corrected. Thoughtful programs, 3 types of pressure, manual mode and other convenience. Even those who have never had such electrical appliances cook freely from day 1.
Reviews on Yandex were written by people who had not even seen this pressure cooker (their "complaints" are so absurd). The girls and I have already discussed some "pearls".
It seems to me that it is not entirely correct to judge the device by reading such "reviews" of random people ...

... the removable cover is wildly inconvenient ((((

Than? The lid is inserted into a special hole in the handle! Very comfortably.

I will write objectively about Polaris 0305, she stews meat perfectly and without pretensions, but the removable lid is wildly inconvenient ((((

Quite the opposite, the most convenient is a removable lid that can be washed at any time. But on Panasonic, you do practically acrobatic tricks over the sink to wash the lid inside.

[Polaris PPC 0205AD]

And about Polaris PPC 0205AD have you heard? This is a twin, one to one with Liberty MP-900... It's not worth buying, very bad reputation (negative reviews are almost two thirds of the total).

AlexM, specially chosen among worst models?

Don't mislead people based on the number of stars on the Yandex market. Polaris 205 is a good simple pressure cooker, better than some redmonds, there are simply no fake reviews there. People complain that the top is not fried, that there is no 3D and a switch .... By the way, it has a wonderful lid design, removable and folding at the same time. It is very difficult to break it (I tried). Does not burn, does not spit, works silently. And it is inexpensive.

It’s inconvenient that I didn’t adapt to dress it, I have to turn it every time in order to fit it correctly. And at the expense of washing ... I have Brand 6051. Firstly, under pressure, the lid is always clean, wiped it with a cloth and that's it, and secondly, the lid is unscrewed.
No, whatever you want, but I will no longer have multicooker with removable lids.

So they did not need to twirl it and immediately put it sideways into the handle

It's easy to take off, I can't get it on before I start cooking.

[Olga,]

Olga, You are the first person to complain about a cover in this model.

Elena, do you know all the users of this model?)))

[Olga,]

Olga, of course not. But for a year now I have been reading all the opinions of users in the Polaris thread. I have not met any complaints similar to yours.

So I am the only one) But I will not deceive that I like this moment either)) If I didn’t have a Brand pressure cooker with a convenient hinged lid, I also would not know that it could be much more convenient than Polaris)

Please advise which cartoon to buy. I constantly cook soups, cereals not in milk, casseroles ... The fact is that our choice of multicooker is very limited. Available for sale - Redmond RMC-M90, Redmond RMC-M70, Redmond RMC-M4502,
Polaris PСМ 0517, Sinbo SCO5035. I haven't found anything else yet. Tell me which one is best for this?
I don't want to throw it out in a year. Reviews like Polaris PСМ 0517 have the least negative reviews and cook well.

[rina-irina]

rina-irina, Sinbo is quite simple, there is not even a manual time setting, let alone the temperature. Redmond RMC-M4502 was very popular at one time, and now it is morally outdated: a multi-cook with a temperature step of 20 degrees (for a long time there is also 1 degree, 5 and 10 is the norm, one might say). And M70, M90 and 0517 are comparable in functionality and differ slightly (in percentage) in the amount of negative reviews.

I would choose myself from these three models at a cost - cheaper. If the difference in price does not matter to you, then you need to choose the one that looks good.

Only 0517 needs to be purchased after October 2013 - this will be the latest version.

Brand 6051 is good for soups, stewing meat, but you can't cook good pilaf in "rice" mode.

Excellent pilaf is obtained in manual mode.

[zogar]

zogar
Thank you! I'm thinking of asking a friend to buy it in St. Petersburg, send it along with a spare bowl and ask them to run it in again. Even if the shipment costs 2000 rubles, it will cost me half the price here.
Today I was surfing the Internet almost all day, and then I compared the prices ..... I'll go and persuade my friend.
I decided to choose between 0517 and 0527 - which would be cheaper

I have Polaris 0517 faithfully served 1.5 g, now she cooks in another family, even a whole saucepan, and she bought herself a more expensive one with a large number of programs. And they screw up on Redmond for the name, none of the listed models is close to Field0517 in terms of price and quality.

Which one did you buy?

[About shipment:]

Even if the shipment costs 2000 rubles ...

About shipment: by no means by mail (expensive!), but by federal transport companies, for example, "PEK", "Business Lines", "Baikal-Service", etc.

Delivery will cost 300-450 rubles, for example, delivery of multi from Tyumen to Volgograd cost me 320 rubles. (in December 2012).

I have Polaris 0517 faithfully served 1.5 g

Mine is 1 year old, works with might and main! Now it is produced even more sophisticated. With deactivation of the delay start. Her ceramic saucepan is not very good. I immediately took the stainless steel

[and]

As for the shipment: by no means by mail (expensive!), But by federal transport companies, for example, PEC, Delovye Lines, Baikal-Service, etc.

something tells me that Rina-Irina does not live in Russia

Thank you! I'm thinking of asking a friend to buy in Pandterburg

specially chosen among the worst models?

after such statements, it becomes unclear how to treat your reviews in general.
h-yeah ...

I will write objectively about Polaris 0305, she stews meat perfectly and without pretensions, but the removable lid is wildly inconvenient ((((

For me personally, a removable cover is a convenience. If we consider this a disadvantage, then about 9 out of 10 models have it))
We even have a grandmother in her 73 years old herself (!!!) without helpers (!) From the first time she coped with this cover and never once complained that she was uncomfortable

... something tells me that Rina-Irina does not live in Russia ...

If the delivery country is not Russia, then only by mail (if not by courier).

It is possible that more suitable options for the place of purchase are possible ...

after such statements, it becomes unclear how to treat your reviews in general.
h-yeah ...

Well, they convinced me, since the Smile emoticon is not enough, now in such cases I will mark (in parentheses): "joke" - in bold type, with an exclamation mark, and (probably necessary?) In red.

Okay, convinced, since the "Smile" emoticon is not enough

I never understood people who, having said frank muck, immediately justify themselves that this is, like, a "joke", so yes, in my case a smiley is not enough.

... so yeah, in my case the emoji is not enough.

You did not specify about the color - lay out the explanations in red or in some other way?

You did not specify about the color - lay out the explanations in red or in some other way?

it does not matter to me what color you carry the next stupidity "joke" to the masses.
I do not think that I will continue to read your theoretical conclusions based on YAM reviews

Which one did you buy?

Marta MT-1979

[The author invites everyone who is antipathetic to his writings, just skip the posts of zogar, do not read this bullshit]

I do not think that I will continue to read your theoretical conclusions based on YAM reviews

I support and approve - a very correct decision, very much! Even earlier, he offered it to all well-wishers.

The author invites everyone who is antipathetic to his writings, just skip the posts of zogar, do not read this bullshit - in order to maintain mental health and good mood!

I received a Redmond 250 cartoon as a gift from my husband. I have been staring at it for a long time and studying the reviews, and finally I was able to use it myself. I have good impressions: I tried to cook according to recipes from the book, and added a couple of my own. I tried the "Curd" mode - it turned out very tasty. The quality of the bowl is also pleasing: a reliable, smooth surface.

)

If you choose from cheap ones, then it's better not to choose at all))

This is a big misconception. More expensive does not mean better quality!

Another Redmond guy?

Another Redmond guy?

All the more sophisticated and sophisticated marketing tools work, but there are a couple of signs that always give them away: usually they mention / promote an expensive model (usually M250) and beginners (with one or two messages).

And at one time I just fell for such an advertisement and bought a Redmond) just 250. Now the truth was watching the price for it lower than when I bought it, it's a shame) But for, soon a year as a user, I was not disappointed in the choice. I am satisfied with functionality and appearance inside and out. Now I even look at the functions that it has began to appear in other multicooker, so I don’t want a new one yet - I don’t see a multicooker that has significantly surpassed my functionality. Therefore, I sometimes look closely at advertising - suddenly something interesting will be)

In any case, when choosing a model and company, do not chase too low a price. You buy the device for years, and cheap brands such as Polaris and Scarlet do not work long and badly. If there are no special requirements, we can definitely recommend Redmond. A well-assembled device. It has all the functions of a modern multicooker and many service modes. The internet is full of recipes for this particular brand. I am writing based on my own experience, at first I was worn out with cheap models.

In terms of the quality of the multicooker, Polaris and Redmond are of the same plan. The only advantage of Redmond is the 2 year warranty versus 1 year for Polaris. But this circumstance does not protect the buyer from marriage and further hassle with exchanges, repairs. As for the prices ... Redmond is more expensive because of its marketing policy - advertising costs money. And the recipes ... our forum is full of recipes for almost any multicooker. Welcome to the forum

[R]

Mannochka, this is Redmond's leftist again! he registered in order to praise the radish.
so tired of these zasRlantsy!
I myself do not consider them multi, and I will not advise my friends.

as they say - we would have your worries ... with the choice of a saucepan on the tile .... a lot of goods turned out to be not good == went into a real or virtual store - you look at their price, look into your wallet, and here it is a saucepan! !! well, the color or shape can still be selected by spoon and bowl