Choosing a multicooker, pressure cooker, rice cooker (2)

But here is scared off by a bowl of 4 liters, probably extra. the cup will not be easy to buy

scares off a bowl of 4 liters, probably extra. the cup will not be easy to buy

Interestingly, and the bowls for Dex 60m still sell? They are of good quality and also 4 liters. Only in size you need to look

We sell bowls mainly for Redmond and Polaris, I have not met the Dexovsky

Still wondering, did anyone come across MV Vitek? 4212 or 4216, for example.

How do they work? do Polaris bowls fit them?

Better Polaris than Vitek. Polaris will be more reliable.

Have you come across Polaris 0510? Need a girlfriend to Flora 0508 One can't cope. I don’t want a multi-cook, dear too

Hello!) My Panaska 18 departed into another world and the question of replacement arose. After reading the topic, I found new, for myself, multi and I can not choose (. Here are the candidates: SFC.919 Chef One 5L, Stadler Form and Steba DD2 XL slow cooker, slow cooker. In the latter, I admired the baking pots)))) In Panaska I loved to bake biscuits, casseroles, stew meat and steam, but pilaf did not work out.

Polaris 0510

She has a non-removable plate on the lid. Does this bother you? And so a very good multicooker. Polaris has other good multicooker, though.

Multi-cooker SFC.919 Chef One 5L, Stadler Form and Multi-cooker-pressure cooker-slow cooker Steba DD2 XL. In the latter, we admired the baking pots))))

Stadler is a multicooker. Shteba is a pressure cooker. Differs from DD1 discussed earlier in volume. You will first decide if you need a pressure cooker or a slow cooker.

The current multi plate is not removable, therefore it does not bother. What else would you advise standing from Polaris? in a tight budget.

You can and not necessarily Polaris, I started, etc. to watch multi, but in each of them something does not fit. I wish you could buy extra. bowl, and that's just Polaris and Redmond. But if there is a MV, to which these cups will fit, I will be glad

Stadler is a multicooker. Shteba is a pressure cooker. Differs from DD1 discussed earlier in volume. You will first decide if you need a pressure cooker or a slow cooker.

Multiple was enough;) There are not many reviews for Stadler, but Shteba is declared as "three in one". Is Stadler better than Panaski?

There was a message for Alisa_t. Since the girl has already decided on the choice, it is no longer relevant. In addition, I still cannot recommend this model to anyone, because there are problems with it.

[innesss-ka]

innesss-ka, thanks, I will take a look. I wanted to keep within 700 hryvnia, but maybe over time I will fork out for 1000

Yes, please give me a reference. I looked in our stores - an average of 1300

Thank you

so that the link is not a link, it is enough to remove

Has anyone come across the ROTEX REPC55-W mv? there is no multi-cook, but what about the quality of the bowl?

Shteba is declared as "three in one". Is Stadler better than Panaski?

I've already written about Shteba so many times here. The pressure cooker is. That is, it works under pressure at the boiling point of water. Frying without pressure, and low temperatures - languor, yoghurt, sous ...
Which is better than Panasonic? If we are talking about SR-MHS181, then they are very similar.

What else would you advise standing from Polaris?

Latest version of 17th model, 31st model. This is one of the proven ones. Although, the 31st has some difficulties with the clock. I don't know how massive it is.
Redmond M23 is an interesting model, a novelty. It has a mismatch in temperatures on a multi-cook, a deviation upward by about 5 ° C. It is for information only.I cannot say that this is bad. There is one touch mode. The languor mode resembles quenching rather than languishing.

[Alisa_t]

Alisa_t, but look at GORENJE MCE4W, although the brand is well-known. Fits in your budget. I would not dare to take something completely unknown. Unless you want to be a pioneer.

There are a lot of good reviews for "no cheaper" on Rotex, but this is a cartoon pressure cooker. Don't know how good it is

Burning looked. On some sites they write that there is a multi-cook, on others they complain that they were counting on him, but he was not.

I've already written about Shteba so many times here. The pressure cooker is. That is, it works under pressure at the boiling point of water. Frying without pressure, and low temperatures - languor, yoghurt, sous ...
Which is better than Panasonic? If we are talking about SR-MHS181, then they are very similar.

The stadler is induction, and the Panasonic SR-MHS181 is new. Right? I haven't met induction cartoons yet

Nah, Stadler is tenuous))

The stadler is induction, and the Panasonic SR-MHS181 is new. Right?

Both Stadler and Panasony TENovye. Stadler has three bowl sizes (three models differing in the displacement of the bowls): 5, 4, 3 liters. Panasonic 5 liters.
Panasonic and Stadler are not much different.

Panasonic and Stadler are not much different.

Is Stadler's cup better than Panasonic's? For five years, I changed the bowl three times.

The new Panasonic has a much better bowl than the old one. Stadler has a very good quality bowl.

The new Panasonic has a much better bowl than the old one. Stadler has a very good quality bowl.

Thank you so much!) I think to stay at Stadler, because Panasik was already there. And the assembly of both cartoons in China?

Yes, China. Now the overwhelming majority of equipment is from China.
I just want to warn you that these multi-cookers have sensory milk - there are unforeseen situations, even Stadler's bowl is thick-walled, heavy, heats up for a long time (this is about frying). Stadler does not have a multi-cook. There is Panasonic (but strange, except that 40 ° C and 80 ° C can be used).

In the end, I took Polaris 0305, a pressure cooker. I understand.

Tell me, if the program provides for cooking with a closed lid, and I will do it with an open one, is it not dangerous for the device? I want to sterilize preservation

[Alisa_t]

Alisa_t, congratulations on the new thing
It is not dangerous for the device, but it will boil strongly.
Preservation can be sterilized with a closed lid under pressure. I sterilize all preservation with screw caps for 0.5 and 0.7 liters

Thank you

Because of the boiling boiling, I sterilize in the control panel and on the stove.
How do you put the cans, twisting slightly?

How do you put the cans, twisting slightly?

Why slightly? I twist them completely and immerse them in water.

[Manna]

Manna, on what program and how long do you sterilize?

Any high pressure program. And in time. It depends on the product. But on average 10-15 minutes (sometimes more - 20-30 minutes).

Girls and friends asked me to advise them on a slow cooker - a bread maker (2 in 1). I saw only Vitek, but I'm afraid to advise him somehow. Maybe there are some more? Who has heard of such a technique?

[Laris]

Laris, yet the binaton is already verified rechecked. Polaris released one. Honestly, I don't understand this technique - neither a multicooker, nor a bread maker. While the bread is rising, baking, will they be hungry?

Manna, honestly, me too. But I justify them with a 2-room apartment with a kitchen of 5 meters and a family of 5 people, so I didn't even dissuade them. I know how tight they are. I will take a look now. Thanks for the advice . If they buy, I will write their reviews

and a family of 5 people

Moreover, where are they 2-in-1? They are better off with a large slow cooker. And then buy a bread maker (if needed). Well, right. When they bake bread in it, if only at night And who will take out bread from the bucket at night? He will get wet until morning. And if with a delay, then in the morning it is still early to eat.I don't know. And if you cook porridge for the morning with a delay, then what kind of bread is there?

I went to have a conversation. But I know her character. If you get it into your head, you will change your mind. But, Manna, it's up to you and me to warn you, and it's up to her to make a decision. In any case, our conscience will be calm, we did everything we could
Well, and again - since things are released, then they are needed by someone.

once things are released, it means that someone needs them.

You know ... more often than not, supply generates demand, not vice versa, as Uncle Keynes taught us all

I bring here for those who are looking at redmond 13/23:

Girls, I'm crying! This control ring let me down (Manna, probably, looked into the water) It became live your life uncontrollable - when scrolling in one direction, it jumps forward and backward through the menu, and the time is generally unrealistic to set.
In general, I took it to the service, but they did not give me any comforting forecasts. They said - most likely for cancellation. Now I will wait for the result. Keep your fists for me. Although I don't even know which is better - I want it to be repaired and returned, because I like it! Yes, and I don’t want to mess with shipments. On the other hand, what if this is a conceptual flaw? So, girls, weigh everything before buying. And I went to cry (and my advice in choosing I will go clean)

I think to stop at Stadler, because Panasik was already there. And the assembly of both cartoons in China?

Look towards the new Panas for 6990 which. This is the ultimate dream. The bowl is gorgeous. And stadler - why do you need this noname? After Panas and the taste of dishes from it, it is problematic with the selection of cartoons. Although - try it. Everyone has the right to choose. And tomorrow I will get a small new Panas, it is a pity, of course, that this chic Panas is only in 5L performance, otherwise I would immediately buy such a small one.

[Mannochka]

Mannochka, well, it’s like Innesski’s. And this is a new cartoon, as I understand it? My Lakuchinka started giving out this after 2 years. But I still use it, though rarely. Recently the bowl banged, well, she bent, naturally, went to buy a bowl from Brandik, but they are not, I had to buy a bowl from some Redmond. The bowl is still good, the pastries are flying out, and then we'll take a look.

And this is a new cartoon, as I understand it?

Yes, brand new Very sorry But this is Redmond

Girls! My Redmond started having problems too. I have a small one, very simple, they brought it to me from Russia a couple of years ago. therefore, there can be no question of guaranteed assistance, especially since I bought a worthy replacement for it.
It constantly fails, that is, it gives an E5 error. Probably, these are problems in electronics.
So I wanted to ask, can I somehow use his cup?

Who thinks about the Philips hd3095? The price tag, of course, is too high for now, but the characteristics are interesting and in terms of design they seem to be neat ...

[Mirabel]

Mirabel, but of course you can, if it fits with another multicooker. Or do you want to use it on the stove? This is also possible, with me, if I do not remove the bowl from the stove in time, my husband can cook in it on gas, for example, dumplings or pasta (in my absence).

Philips hd3095

Here's a good overview about her

You can completely remove the cover from it. The bowl is thick with a quality coating with handles. I think that in the near future the price for it will not fall much

[zhariks]

zhariks, Phillips have good bowls, but any ceramics, even with careful care, after a few months begins to lose their non-stick properties. This is a feature of the coating - microcracks appear.
Model 3095 is a four-liter, it should be borne in mind that you cannot use all these 4 liters, but only two-thirds of the volume - that is, no more than 2.66 liters. (these are the recommendations of the manufacturers). The price is overpriced, in terms of features - nothing outstanding. The bowl is ceramic, the set of programs is the most common.

Phillips have good bowls, but any ceramics, even with careful care, after a few months begins to lose their non-stick properties.This is a feature of the coating - microcracks appear.

Phillips bowls are very good. This model has a truly ceramic coating. But high quality. Any ceramic coating needs special care, not the same as with a conventional non-stick coating - you cannot heat without food, not hit it, even lightly, let alone drop it - then these microcracks will go; wash with the hard side of a not new sponge every time after cooking, very carefully so that no plaque remains. With this care, the bowl can serve for a long time. And it is better to fry in oil (and pour the oil into a still cold bowl), otherwise if you put a cold product on a heated surface, the pores will become clogged at the contact points, the product will stick, and over time these places will coke. Precisely because of the special care and the fact that the market is flooded with low-quality ceramic-coated bowls, we are more inclined towards non-stick. But a high-quality ceramic coating is better than a low-quality non-stick one. Although, of course, I would prefer a Philips one with a non-stick coating instead of this bowl.

Model 3095 is a four-liter, it should be borne in mind that you cannot use all these 4 liters, but only two-thirds of the volume - that is, no more than 2.66 liters. (these are manufacturers' recommendations)

Five-liter bowls are only useful for preparing large quantities, such as soups. And most often they are used only for 1 / 4-1 / 6 of their volume. So 4-liter is not small at all. And if necessary, then we fill the bowls, above the MAX mark.

Overpriced

Phillips always have high prices - pay for the name and quality control.
In general, all these are "candy wrappers". I wonder how the modes will show themselves in practice

I saw the review, but it is purely advertising. So it does not carry much value, only allows you to visually evaluate. The functionality, in my opinion, is not bad for the Brand model (I do not consider Russian-Chinese consumer goods) - all the basic programs are there. In almost all programs you can change both the time and temperature. There is a multi-cook, a large clear display, a nice design. But of course real reviews are interesting, otherwise there is one advertisement everywhere.

I wonder how the modes will show themselves in practice

That's it

it is purely advertising

Such reviews are all promotional

Of course, real reviews are interesting, otherwise there is one advertisement everywhere

I have not met real reviews. I am also interested in how programs behave.Users with a high price bracket are less likely to have users