Choosing a multicooker, pressure cooker, rice cooker (2)

I have this three-liter Martha, the soup really boils a little more than I like. I cook many things that require gentle stewing in milk porridge. A very good slow cooker, though I found a thicker bowl over time. The ceramics began to stick as expected after six months.
Unlike the 10th, Panasonic already knows how to fully fry and cook faster. But now I would immediately choose a 3 liter Polaris, turning off the heating and a multi-cook, in my opinion, a multicooker is very necessary.

cook porridge in a thermos = just now there is a large selection of them both in price and in volume

It is interesting! I believe auntie Although I will also have a hozza device to plug it into a socket.

But now I would immediately choose a 3 liter Polaris, turning off the heating and a multi-cook, in my opinion, a multicooker is very necessary.

Ugh, I almost decided to take Redik, but here it is! In Redik, too, you can adjust the pace? Or am I confusing? To be honest, this choice is already a mess in my head.

[Deana]

Deana, Polaris, in my opinion, is better with the accuracy of the temperature setting of the modes. Although they are very very similar

[Anastasenok]

But now I would immediately choose a 3 liter Polaris, turning off the heating and a multi-cook, in my opinion, a multicooker is very necessary.

Anastasenok, I would definitely choose for myself, but to granny ... And the girls wrote about Polaris - the cup is bad, that is, it is necessary to take it right away with the cartoon. Is this Marta in circulation like Panasik? I have 10 - no problem at all!

[anavi]

anavi, and in March and in that very rare bowl, too, is not a fountain. 02 Redmond has a good bowl. And cooks delicious porridge and buckwheat on baby food awesome. Bakes well. But there is no multi-cook and a maximum of two will do.

[Anastasenok]

Anastasenok, yes, with the bowls, of course, the rads are in trouble ... My mom and daughter have 01. And 02 is still too small - 1.6 liters?

they are triggered from a nearby hand carried

Natasha, is this not a marriage? I have a Philips with touch buttons. There is not even close, what you are writing about. And it also has a button for blocking such cases. The lock is drawn on it. True, I didn't even have to use it. I barely remembered now about its existence. Look, maybe yours also has a similar one?

Polaris, in my opinion, is better with the accuracy of the temperature setting of the modes

And there are two of them! 49 and 50! And how to choose?

02 Redmond has a good bowl. And cooks delicious porridge and buckwheat on baby food awesome. Bakes well.

What is it !!!

[anavi]

anavi, Olga, so the volume in Redmond-02 will not be 1.6, but even less, approximately 1.2 liters?

[Anastasenok]

means in Redmond-02 the volume will not be 1.6, but even less,

I think yes! In 01 bowl 2 liters - but the volume, respectively, is somewhere around 1.5!

and in March and in that very rare bowl, too, there is no fountain

Anastasenok, and in Brand 701 as a bowl, do not you know?

[anavi]

anavi, for three of us, it goes well with side dishes, goulash, two servings of milk porridge. Meatballs, soups at one time. But the older generation hardly cooks like that. Although, see for yourself. In general, the model is very successful and in delicate modes it is quite possible to cook to the very top, 1.5 liters is quite.

In general, the model is very successful and in delicate modes it is quite possible to cook to the very top, 1.5 liters is quite.

I love to the very top

.

[Larissa]

Larissa, I don’t know, but rather this is the norm for them. Just very sensitive
I did not find the lock. I need to go to the store and feel

Mom bought herself a REDMOND SkyCooker M92S Smart Multicooker the other day. Complains that the programs "jump" when you touch the touch buttons and did not like the soup - "muddy trash heap". She remembers her old Redmond and regrets that she passed it under the recycling program

I received my multicooker Marta 4308 with Greblon C3 + coating today, but it is rough ... for some reason I thought it would be smooth ... but it does not have a hint of ceramics ... so I think how it is from the point of view practicality ... although I read a lot of reviews and no one complained about the coverage ...

["ceramic coating GREBLON® CK2"]

"ceramic coating GREBLON® CK2"

Thick-walled bowl for use in all types of 5 liter multi-cookers, except pressure cookers.
Internal German double-layer ceramic bowl coating GREBLON® CK2.
In some characteristics, this coating surpasses Korean and other counterparts several times.
Created from natural, environmentally friendly material.
It has antibacterial properties, does not oxidize, does not emit harmful impurities, retains the true taste and useful properties of products, thereby taking care of the quality of food and people's health.

Features:
German ceramics Greblon® CK2
German quality standard for the food industry. In some of its characteristics, it surpasses Korean and other counterparts several times. Created from natural, environmentally friendly material. It has antibacterial properties, does not oxidize, does not emit harmful impurities, preserves the true taste and useful properties of products, thereby taking care of the quality of food and, as a result, human health.

Thick-walled
Thanks to its thick walls, such a bowl evenly distributes heat, ensuring cooking without sticking, more resistant to mechanical and temperature influences and has a longer service life.

In a bowl with this coating, it is recommended prepare food and meals at low temperature and for a long period.
In this bowl You can store food after cooking.
Modes:
Milk porridge
Russian chef
Boiled pork
Jelly
Yogurt
Languish
Extinguish
Cooking
Soup
Milk
Cottage cheese
Children food
Groats

[Admin]

Created from natural,

Admin, there are no natural materials! Above, I already wrote what it is.

[Admin]

Admin, I have a C3 + coating, but it looks different. C3 + as sprayed, rough to the touch. We have already tried the Fry mode - they were preparing homemade sausage, I probably got a little "screwed up" with the mode, I had to choose a more authentic mode ... in my opinion there are many functions of the same type. In general, I was pleased with the cooking result, the sausages were browned and nothing stuck to the bowl. Now about the 4308 model itself - the design is beautiful, it takes up much less space than my departed oval-shaped Aurora. The buttons are pressed normally. The pan is not thickened at all ... light, looseness inside the multicooker, which is not convenient during cooking and I think that because of this the bottom of the pan will scratch from the outside. The multicooker itself, due to its low weight and the absence of rubberized legs, rolls well on the table. These are the small minuses I noted for myself, but I think you can get used to it.

backlash inside the multicooker,

I also crawl a little. It's okay, that's how it was intended for some reason. The instructions even suggest moving a little when installing the pan to make sure that it fits onto the heater without distortions. And scratches on the outside are not terrible. Don't overdo your washing. As a rule, it is enough to drip a little dish detergent and rinse the pans two or three times with warm water in a circular motion.
Good luck to you!

[Wit]

Wit, Thank you. And I also understood why the so-called 3D heating is possible - the walls of the multicooker are internal metal, that is, they heat up during cooking. In my Aurora, the walls were plastic!

Helen, this is pseudo 3D heating. Full 3D heating can be talked about if there is a heater on the lid. But it does not give a special advantage in such a volume. Well, the cupcake on top will brown more

[Wit]

Wit, Vitaly, I understand what 3D heating is. Simply by heating the metal walls, the temperature is maintained along the entire height of the bowl, and when the walls are plastic, only the pan from the lower heating element is heated.

Of course.

Peace be with you bakers!

I cooked porridge for the dog in a saucepan on the stove today

The lid of the pan was hot - I sit thinking a lot

Tolya, do not hesitate - this is also 3D

And there would be no cover ...

Peace be with you bakers!
And he didn't take it dearly - luminium

Well, I'm clever

As for the heating elements, depending on the price category to which the multicooker belongs, their number and principle of operation differ. So, for example, budget options are equipped with one, lower heating element. As the price increases, heating elements are installed not only in the lower part, but also on the sides, and even in the lid. This arrangement of heaters is called 3D.

Multicooker with heating element (left) and induction (right) heating method.
🔗

well, you guys are comedians ...

SOS !!!!! Today my soup ran out in the multicooker ... the multicooker was poured, water was leaking from the bottom of the multicooker, what can I do ... I washed it of course, dried it from below with a hairdryer ... but I'm afraid to turn it on ...
in 6 years of work of Aurora, I did not have such a thing, so that the water from below would dry up ...

I had this a couple of times, pea soup ran out. Nothing, stood until evening, then turned it on and works as usual.

thank you, calmed me down ... I had a soup with fish dumplings, I probably overdid it with water, and there was a lot of foam

soup ran away in the slow cooker

at the bottom of the multicooker under the shade there are through holes, apparently for such unexpected leaks

I somehow cooked jam, put it on * soup *, so that it boiled faster, so that later I could transfer it to * stewing *, but I missed the time - the jam ran away

I literally rinsed the multicooker through and through with a stream of hot water from the tap (5 l, the shape of a barrel without a nose), taking out the bowl, until everything had caramelized and cooled down, rinsed to clean water

then I didn't use the multicooker for a week, putting it in a draft

mmm, 3 years after it works

probably overdid it with water, and there was a lot of foam

Lena, maybe you messed up the regime? I accidentally set some aggressive
Once at night instead of "porridge" I chose "stewing", in the morning I ate boiled condensed milk with oatmeal

I probably overdid it with water ... thank you very much, otherwise the cartoon is not yet a week ...



my husband disassembled an old multicooker, but it has a different oval shape - he says that there are no more boards except the ten with wires.

Good day. Give me some advice.
There is a choice between Philips HD3197 and HD4749, which one to give preference to?
Currently using Panasonic 18, the only thing I don't like is the cooking time.
Will there be less cooking time in Phillips?

Philips HD3197 and HD4749

Philips multicooker with the functions "Multicook Pro" and "My recipe"

Multicooker Philips HD3197

Philips multicooker with the functions "Multicook Pro" and "My recipe"

Multicooker Philips HD3197

Thank you. I read on HD3197 before.
So what is better? The fourth episode is newer, maybe it's better?

Will there be less cooking time in Phillips?

by the way, why? if there is a certain mode, then it should not differ in time and t on all multicooker, otherwise why then a multicooker, if you need to think about time and t



the pressure cooker cooks fast

So what is better?

eh .. How can you say ?! Probably, in order to answer this question, you need to have 2 of these models available. I, too, now stand at a crossroads with these Phillips. There are 3 wonderful thick-walled bowls from this company, but there is no multicooker itself.
In general, Fili really like their delicacy in cooking, but if it were not for this circumstance, I would have thrown out the bowls and would have forgotten about this company forever.

eh ..How can you say ?! Probably, in order to answer this question, you need to have 2 of these models available. I, too, now stand at a crossroads with these Phillips. There are 3 wonderful thick-walled bowls from this company, but there is no multicooker itself.
In general, Fili really like their delicacy in cooking, but if it were not for this circumstance, I would have thrown out the bowls and would have forgotten about this company forever.

What is wrong with this firm? You were delighted with 3197?

wonderful thick-walled bowls

then threw out the cups and would have forgotten

and what ... why do you want to throw it away, they are on their own
My daughter does not often use the Redmond02 multicooker, but both bowls (one spare) are registered in the oven, she likes their quality

[Irochka]

You were delighted with 3197?

broke. It's good that a kind person was found for her. Probably fix it.
I am now more delighted with the 4726, but nowhere can I find a spare bowl, and my own one began to peel off something very quickly.
Irochka, you must try to bake a cake in one of the bowls! Thank you for the idea, otherwise I just walk around and shed tears about the stupidity and uselessness of these cups.

[Rituslya]

Rituslya, it's a pity that the cup is hard to find. We only have a bowl for a 5-liter multicooker in our store.

[Belka13]

Belka13, Olik, yes, 4 liters have disappeared altogether. Officials don't expect deliveries. And this model is somehow non-standard in terms of bowls.
I really thought it was a sinful thing to buy another multicooker the same.
And what?...
And arrange a warehouse!

Well, yes, Rituel, you have a lot of space at home And your husband won't mind

Damn what to buy. My wife likes the design of 4749. But in 3197 the bowl is 6mm thick and the entire lid is removable, easy to clean.

what to buy.

to whom the multicooker is in hand - that is the decision




good to my husband - nikada did not break his head - what to buy? gets acquainted with all purchases (or does not get to know) upon arrival in the kitchen

to whom the multicooker is in hand - that is the decision

I buy all the equipment, as well as knives and dishes for my wife.
She always delegates this to me.

She always delegates this to me.

gullible ...
and the pleasure of choosing and buying once she does not get?

The question was resolved. The wife said the lid should be removed for cleaning. And this is just HD3197 and bought it.